Tuesday, 2 May 2023

Miscarriages and Dead Infants Were Described in a Secret FDA Review, but Hidden from The Public

Source:

https://igorchudov.substack.com/p/miscarriages-and-dead-infants-were

Pfizer Tried to Hide Its Report for 75 Years

24 APR 2023

A new document was released to ICAN this April, thanks to a FOIA legal action that compelled the government to provide Pfizer documents they tried to keep secret for 75 years. Indeed, they had a good reason to hide it.

That document is called “PREGNANCY AND LACTATION CUMULATIVE REVIEW.” Many findings in it validate several concerns of COVID vaccine skeptics.

Pfizer identified 458 pregnancies where mothers were vaccinated.

Of the 673 case reports identified in the search, 458 involved BNT162b2 exposure during pregnancy (mother/fetus) and 215 involved exposure during breast-feeding.

What happened to those pregnancies?

The Vaccine Does Cross the Placenta

We were told that the vaccine “stays in the arm.” Was that true?

On Page 3, Pfizer describes two cases (out of 458) of unborn babies affected by transplacental transfer of mRNA Covid vaccine. Pfizer’s own words:

So, instead of staying in the arm, by Pfizer’s admission, the vaccine traveled through the mother’s body, penetrated the placenta, and adversely impacted the unborn fetuses.

One infant in the above report died of “severe respiratory distress.” (AER 2021191405)

Another infant, born at 24 weeks of gestation, was not followed up because Pfizer did not care enough to discover what happened. However, 24 weeks gestation (5 months since conception) is a very premature birth. About half of the infants born at 24 weeks die, and of the remaining ones, 40% end up with health issues. I pray that that specific infant survived and is doing well; however, we cannot know, and Pfizer chose not to disclose what happened.

The “health experts” who guided pregnant women through the pandemic claimed that the vaccine does not cross the placenta:

High Rate of Miscarriages

Of the 458 pregnancies, 52 ended with pregnancy losses: miscarriage (pregnancy loss under 20 weeks) or spontaneous abortion (pregnancy loss past 20 weeks). That is an 11.3% rate of pregnancy loss.

This did not count the premature infants who died shortly after birth. For example, the above-described premature baby AER 2021191405, died in severe respiratory distress after an emergency C-section following the mother’s COVID vaccination.

Is 11.3% of pregnancies lost normal, or is it abnormally high? Arkmedic explained that answering this question is difficult because the chances of pregnancy loss depend on the week of gestation and are highest in the early weeks. Once pregnant women pass those early weeks, the chance of a loss drops dramatically.

For example, the women who get vaccinated at 23 weeks, like the mom of AER 2021191405, already did not have an early miscarriage, and their chances of pregnancy loss would be low by that moment.

As women of all gestational ages were vaccinated in Pfizer’s population of 458 pregnancies, the expected rate of pregnancy losses (from the moment of vaccination) should be much lower than if the losses were counted from the moment of conception.

If we ask, “What would be a normal pregnancy loss rate of those 458 women if they were injected with a placebo instead of the Covid vaccine,” the precise estimate would be near impossible. However, it is less than 11.3%. Read Arkmedic’s article if you want to know the details.

We also know that the Moderna vaccine (higher dose) increases the chances of pregnancy loss by 42% compared to Pfizer, suggesting a dose-response relationship.

Igor’s Newsletter
CDC Data: Moderna Causes 42% MORE Miscarriages Compared to Pfizer
[I am in a hospital ER right now with a broken foot. Please forgive me if this post is more incoherent than usual. The wait is taking a while, so I decided to try to finish my post about this] Summary This article will show that CDC’s own statistics prove beyond statistical doubt that the higher dose Moderna vaccine causes 42% MORE miscarriages, compared …
Read more

The picture below, a blast from the past from two years ago, proved that the concerns of the person demonstrating were prescient:

Pfizer Report Omits Dead Infant

The Pfizer report, listing adverse events to breastfed infants on page 6, does not mention any dead infants who died while breastfeeding. However, the previous Prizer postmarketing report does mention one breastfeeding infant who died soon after his or her mother was vaccinated. I wrote about that infant a year ago.

Igor’s Newsletter
Pfizer Confidential: 1 infant DEATH vs 1 Successful Birth
Hat tip to Claus L who reminded me that new Pfizer documents were released. Summary: Only two births were recorded, one was successful and another resulted in infant death. Breastfeeding indeed affects infants and proves mRNA vaccine shedding by breastfeeding mothers…
Read more

Not sure why Pfizer “disappeared” the dead infant. Maybe they forgot? We can only guess.

In a way, the mothers who received the Pfizer vaccine are the lucky ones. The women who received Moderna were 42% more likely to suffer a miscarriage and 93% more likely to have their infant die after birth.

What do you think?

Monday, 1 May 2023

UK government tacitly admits the COVID vaccines are killing working age people in the UK in record numbers

Source:

https://stevekirsch.substack.com/p/uk-government-tacitly-admits-the

Their total silence on the excess death numbers in the UK tell you everything you need to know. There is no other intervention that could have caused numbers like these. That's why they are silent.

24 APR 2023
This John Campbell video was posted 3 months ago showing a stunning rise in excess deaths from 4,700 to 26,300. That’s a 5.6X increase. That is not statistical noise. Something caused that. But the UK authorities are silent on this. There is only one thing that could potentially cause this: the COVID vaccine. This is also consistent with the silence from authorities.

Executive summary

This video, Excess deaths in young adults, 2022 data by John Campbell, aired 3 months ago.

Here are some of the highlights:

  1. 2:46 - 3:11 The mortality of ages 20-44 is 7.8% vs. 2.5% increase for the elderly (75 to 84)… John says “this is just a HUGE difference” because young people aren’t supposed to die and it’s unusual when the increase in their deaths is 3X higher than the increase for the elderly. Then he says, “the government MUST give an explanation for this; it’s just incredible.” That’s right! But they are silent. And that’s the problem.

  2. 3:50 - 4:45 There were 31,000 excess deaths in 2022. The distribution was very very odd. The majority of these deaths were not from COVID. The distribution was 4,700 in the first half and 26,300 in the second half. So deaths were 5.7X higher in the second half. That’s huge and MUST be caused by something. What is it? The authorities are SILENT.

  3. 6:57 - 7:18: “This led to more excess deaths in the second half of 2022 than in the second half of any year since 2010”

  4. 7:15 - 8:05: John compares the 7,000 excess deaths in the most recent 3 week period with a terrorist attack. If 7,000 people in the UK were killed by a terrorist attack, would there be no coverage? Why is this different? “Not a squeak” he says.

Since the video aired, there have been no explanations by the UK authorities or anyone else for that matter. Not even Susan Oliver’s dog Cindy has dared to comment on this.

That tells you everything you need to know, doesn’t it?

Introduction

The UK is set up to make the COVID vaccine successful no matter how many people have to be killed.

The UK MHRA used to be the drug regulator in the UK.

Today, their role has shifted to being a vaccine enabler, precisely the opposite of their previous role as a regulatory authority.

When they see huge numbers of reports into the UK Yellow Card system (their version of VAERS), they actually think that it means that the reporting system is working (rather than the drug is unsafe).

Think I’m kidding? Watch this 17-minute video segment from UK Professor Norman Fenton (he just posted it 2 hours ago so you can be one of the first to see this):

Next, check out the Ofcom site. They are the government censor organization that regulates media companies in the UK and will give them heavy fines if they go against the narrative. Check out what they did to Mark Steyn. OfCom was instrumental in having Mark Steyn fired. In their memo, they said Steyn was wrong, yet they didn’t show the correct number. In other words, they can declare you are wrong without telling you the CORRECT number. Convenient isn’t it?

This is why Neil Oliver has been effectively silenced. It’s not because Neil Oliver thinks the vaccines are safe all of a sudden.

Ofcom of course will not penalize you for spreading misinformation if it comports with the government narrative. So watch this video which is clearly false and misleading. The video says if you got the AstraZeneca vaccine, you cannot die or be hospitalized for any reason for the next 14 days. It basically makes you immortal. They are thinking of injecting Ukrainian soldiers with AZ since they cannot die for the next 14 days. No Ofcom sanctions on that one.

Also, John Campbell is now at 2 strikes on YouTube. One more strike and YouTube will obliterate everything he’s ever posted and ban him for life for spreading misinformation.

Because that’s the way science works in the UK where there isn’t a constitutional right to free speech like there was in America.