When Hari Met Reality: The First Time Hari Got Sacked for Making Things Up

 

Johann Hari has made a living out adding a little first person je ne sais quoi to his articles, also known as bullshit. Day after day new evidence emerges of his Matilda-ish tendency to fakery and deception, and it appears to be a trick that he picked up early in his career. In October 1999 he was sacked as News Editor of Cambridge University’s Varsity student newspaper. He told friends at the time it was because the editor was “jealous of my intellect”. Another pure fabrication.

Hari was sacked after his sexed up copy, printed in the October 29 edition, included the made up fact that 1,500 students had taken part in a protest against tuition fees. It turned out to be a ridiculous exaggeration and when the editor was informed that the figure was way out, it was the final straw amidst a growing suspicion that Hari made up things to spice up the copy.

At least his then editor had some spine…

The Orwell Prize committee revealed yesterday that:

“Prior to presenting the award, as part of our due diligence, one of the judges contacted Simon Kelner, editor of The Independent, who expressed his full confidence in the Hari articles”

Other former winners have confirmed to Guido that this was a one off and did not happen regarding their submissions, no other editors have been contacted in this way to vouch for their hacks as far as Guido is aware. What was suspicious about Hari’s work. His reputation for embellishment was well known enough in newsrooms, to make the judges nervous.

The Orwell Prize Council pointedly claimed this week that they have since awarding Hari the Orwell Prize in 2008 tightened up the rules regarding attribution of quotes. Did they have anyone in mind when they made that change?

On discovering yesterday that Hari entered work for the 2011 Orwell Prize, Guido asked the director of the prize to list the articles Hari had entered. He declined. They are it seems to go down the Orwellian memory hole. Jenni Russell won the prize this year. But Hari’s claim to being a prize winner tarnishes the name of the prize. Guido knows for a fact that other prize winners feel genuine anger that Hari is among their prestigious number.

Hari defended himself in his mea culpa article using his own unique definition of plagiarism. To the charge of plagiarism we can add passing off, fraud, deception, profiting from the work of others and lying. He should be asked by the Orwell Prize Council to return the £3,000 prize money and to refrain from describing himself as a former Orwell Prize winner. As for Hari, he should note what happened to Matilda:

Matilda told such Dreadful Lies,
It made one Gasp and Stretch one’s Eyes;
Her Aunt, who, from her Earliest Youth,
Had kept a Strict Regard for Truth,
Attempted to Believe Matilda:
The effort very nearly killed her,
…
For every time she shouted ‘Fire!’
They only answered ‘Little Liar!’
And therefore when her Aunt returned,
Matilda, and the House, were Burned.

Chris Blackhurst was announced as the new editor of The Indy today…

http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/guidofawkes/~3/I6KVr2ZYU2U/