Friday, 31 December 2021
How we can allow doctors to speak freely about what is really going on
Anecdotal data from a pediatric cardiologist shows an estimated 100X increase in myocarditis rates. Cardiologists can't speak out without risking retribution. I have a way to change that... instantly.
I just read a comment on my private “healthcare providers only” substack.
An estimated100X elevation in rate of myocarditis, but nobody will learn of it since cardiologists aren’t going to speak out for fear of retribution
His comment was a private conversation he had with a pediatric cardiologist. The cardiologist is never going to say this in public, to the press, or have his name revealed since his first duty is to his family (keeping his job). If a “fact checker” called the cardiologist, he might either refuse to comment or say “I’m seeing somewhat more cases after the vaccine rolled out.”
Here’s the exact comment that was posted to the private substack:
Recent lunch meeting with pediatric cardiologist friend of mine went like this:
Pre-jab, one or two cases per year of myocarditis. Now, half his waiting room.
Tells parents they are “studying” the causality.
Refers them to infectious disease specialist for discussions on their other children.
Admits he and about 50% of his colleagues know what’s going on but are too terrified to speak out for fear of retaliation from hospitals and state licensing boards.
Other 50% don’t want to know, don’t care and/or are reveling in the cognitive dissonance (like Dr. Harvey [Cohen] at Stanford) and/or letting loose their authoritarian demon.
Good luck with these former colleagues of mine.
The stench is overpowering.
The key sentence is the one in bold. That is gold. Pure gold. I’ll get to that in the “preventable” section below.
From 1 or 2 cases per year to “half his waiting room.” I don’t know the size of his waiting room, but it’s at least two people since he said “half.”
So the rate has increased by: 250 day per year open/1.5 avg cases per year=166X.
But not all the waiting room patients will be unique so we have to discount for that. Since the CDC says most cases are mild, a cardiologist may say “come back if there are problems” or “check back in 6 months” (especially now that they are so busy and hard to book). And his waiting room is likely larger than 2 people so that offsets it.
So estimating a “more than 100X increase” seems reasonable. Especially when you compare that number with other data which shows a much higher rate of increase. In light of that, a 100X increase is more than a reasonable estimate.
The CDC never told us that. They said it would reduce the rate.
Survey suggests 90% of healthcare providers are seeing big increases in myocarditis rates after the vaccine rollout
The anecdote aligns with a survey I did with the full group (asked 1,000 healthcare providers about the myocarditis rates after vaccination). The question was added late after the survey was launched (so only 39 responses), but the answer is extremely clear: it is the exact opposite of what “real scientists” believe based on “science.” All the data I’ve seen is vaccination rates have caused myocarditis rates to skyrocket and put kids in the hospital:
A preventable tragedy… here’s how we can change everything fast
Heart damage in the young will have many long-term consequences and overall life expectancy will drop dramatically. This will destroy millions of lives.
If the 50% of doctors who are afraid to speak out are allowed to speak out, that would change everything, wouldn’t it? Almost instantly.
So I have an idea. The medical boards are controlled by the state. Suppose a governor and a Surgeon General instructed the state medical boards that freedom of speech is essential for doctors and that no doctor can have his licensed examined on the basis of anything he says PUBLICLY that is true since that would be a violation of his first amendment rights. Of course, the first amendment says your speech can be limited if you cause harm to others, but cardiologists speaking the truth about what they observe is doing the opposite: it is preventing harm to others.
I’m thinking Florida, and I just left a voice message for my friend Joe Ladapo. He is the one guy in America who could end all this bullshit instantly by some action in his state. I’ll let you know what he says.
There is one clear benefit of vaccination
The only clear benefit to vaccination is that it will allow you to keep your job or attend school in January. This is the key reason for many people.
While there is some evidence that vaccination will temporarily (and negligibly on an absolute basis) boost your immunity against COVID (for about 30 days for Omicron), it will then leave you with a (possibly) permanently damaged immune system for Omicron and other diseases in the long run. It’s a lousy tradeoff. Read this article, if you haven’t already, on the 30-day efficacy of the vaccines.
Thursday, 30 December 2021
CDC Withdraws Use of PCR Test for COVID and Finally Admits the Test Can Not Differentiate Between the Flu and COVID Virus
This is BIG NEWS.
After December 31, 2021, the CDC will withdraw the emergency use authorization of the PCR test for COVID-19 testing. The CDC finally admitted the test does not differentiate between the flu and COVID virus.
Via the CDC website In preparation for this change, CDC recommends clinical laboratories and testing sites that have been using the CDC 2019-nCoV RT-PCR assay select and begin their transition to another FDA-authorized COVID-19 test. CDC encourages laboratories to consider adoption of a multiplexed method that can facilitate detection and differentiation of SARS-CoV-2 and influenza viruses. Such assays can facilitate continued testing for both influenza and SARS-CoV-2 and can save both time and resources as we head into influenza season.
This explains the disappearance of Flu cases in the US in 2020. It also inflated the COVID cases as Dr. Fauci and the DC elites knew would happen.
TRENDING: PART 3: WE CAUGHT THEM: Deep State Operative Don Berlin Presented Bogus Election Dossier to President Trump Before 1-6, Now Jan 6 Committee is Using This to Claim Insurrection and Take Down President Trump
Via Europe Reloaded:
QUIETLY WITHOUT MEDIA ATTENTION, THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION (CDC) HAS WITHDRAWN THE PCR PROCESS AS A VALID TEST FOR DETECTING AND IDENTIFYING SARS-COV-19
It is extraordinary that the CDC’s withdrawal of the test received no attention from the media or politicians.
Dr. Kary Mullis, Nobel Laureate and inventor of the PCR process said several years ago that “the PCR is a process. It does not tell you that you are sick.” It was never meant to be a Covid test.
A radiologist noticed a weird finding. Since the vaccines rolled out, the number of cases of unexplained adenopathy findings went from 1 every 6 months to 2 to 3 per day. That's an increase of 360X.
I can’t say much more than this because the radiologist is a sole breadwinner and doesn’t want to lose his job.
Since the vaccines rolled out, the number of cases of unexplained adenopathy findings went from 1 every 6 months to 2 to 3 per day. That's an increase of 360X. The key word here is “unexplained.”
I note this result so that others can be aware of this.
The biopsy of these cases all revealed there was no metastatic disease, no lymphoma, and it was “non-specific.”
So for now, an unexplained finding.
But hey, we’ll just carry on as usual, like nothing bad is happening. No need to pause the vaccines of course (ok, a little sarcasm there).
Here’s a comment from one of my readers:
Recently had a mammogram in San Mateo, the technician asked before the procedure if I would mind answering the question about if I had been vacated and if so when. I asked “why?” She told me the radiologists that read them want to know because of the large number of women they’ve encountered with enlarged lymph nodes in the armpit. Now I’m wondering if they’ll start ignoring this if the answer was “yes” and recently vaccinated...
Over 10,000 vaccine deaths in South Korea shortly after vaccination
The government says it wasn't the vaccine, but is compensating victims in a few serious cases. I'd estimate that that the true figure closer to 40,000 people that have been killed to date.
Today’s story comes via my friend Sid Mehta who worked for me at Mouse Systems nearly 40 years ago.
He sent me this Zerohedge article which appears not to have gotten much attention by the mainstream media in the US for some reason… I can’t imagine why. It it details over 10,000 deaths shortly after vaccination in South Korea.
There are 52 million people in South Korea. The booster was recently given to 16M people:
Mathew Crawford earlier determined a conservative death rate of 411 deaths per million doses, so 411 deaths/M * 100M = 41,100 deaths.
Which means I’m a believer that the “over 10,000 deaths” is realistic.
If we use the South Korea “reference” of just 10,000 killed per 100M doses of the vax as “truth,” then we are looking at around 100 deaths per M doses.
In the US we have around 500M doses which would be “at least” 50,000 deaths. While not nearly as high as my latest estimate of 388,000 American deaths, it sets a lower bound that is hard to argue with… even just 50,000 American deaths is nearly 1,000X higher than any reasonable scientist would consider an acceptable death rate. In 1976, we stopped the H1N1 vaccine after just 32 deaths.
The report of over 10,000 people in South Korea who died shortly after being vaccinated seems credible to me. Using that as a reference benchmark, we calculate at least 50,000 Americans that have been killed by the vaccine.
While this is less than my most recent estimate of 388,000, the 50,000 is simply a very credible lower bound and is yet another data point showing how incredibly we inept we are at assessing death from the COVID vaccines.
The Pfizer clinical trial showed we might save 1 COVID death every 6 months for every 22,000 people we vaccinate. So we may have saved around 20,000 COVID deaths over the past 12 months.
So even using the super conservative death toll of 50,000 Americans killed by the vaccine compared to 20,000 lives saved from COVID, the vaccines are still completely nonsensical.
Perhaps that is why I am not in politics.
Tuesday, 28 December 2021
Estimated 1 in 95 boys diagnosed with myocarditis in a California private school
This will blow your mind, I promise. I'm pretty sure that the rate of myocarditis is a LOT more than the CDC is telling people. I think the rate is ~100X higher than they claim. What do you think?
According to this Reuters Fact Check published a few days ago, Dr June Raine, chief executive of Britain’s Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA), said that myocarditis and pericarditis remain a “very rare potential risk” with Pfizer and Moderna vaccines.
Seriously?!? A rare potential risk, eh? Are you kidding me?!?
Look, just because she said that doesn’t mean it is true.
For a long time, I’ve been on the record as saying that the rate of myocarditis is around 1 in 317 for teenage boys. That was a conservative estimate since it used a VAERS under-reporting factor (URF) of 41, which is reserved for only the most serious events.
Since the CDC calls this “mild” (even though every cardiologist I’ve asked says there is no such thing as “mild” myocarditis), we’d expect a URF of perhaps 80 or more since nobody died and most had a short hospital stay.
In short, a more “realistic” estimate is 1 in 150.
I didn’t want to use that in my original slide because 1 in 317 was already far from the CDC estimate of 1 in 13,000 which they said was “rare.” If I was more accurate, my work would be more likely to be ignored as ridiculously high. So I went with a very conservative URF=41. Here’s the slide I’ve been using up until today:
Finally, I heard some data from a private school that validates my estimate
Today, I heard from a parent of a child who attends Monte Vista Christian school that 3 children were diagnosed with myocarditis after they got the vaccine. The school has 855 kids. In autumn, the parent learned that 3 students had myocarditis.
Let’s do a little math.
The ratio of male to female rates of myocarditis is roughly 10:1 so it’s a good bet these were all boys. Roughly half the school are boys. There has never been a vaccine mandate at the school. So I’d estimate conservatively that 2/3 of the kids could have been vaccinated by then. So 855/2*2/3 = 285 vaccinated boys.
So the rate of myocarditis at the school by my estimate is 3/285 which is 1 in 95 boys.
This makes sense to me overall; it is not far from my 1 in 150 estimate.
1 in 95 boys with myocarditis is a train wreck
1 in 95 boys with myocarditis (which is never “mild”) should cause an immediate halt to the vaccines and an examination of how the CDC could possibly miss a safety signal this large.
But I also know what will happen next.
The CDC will ignore this by writing it off as an unconfirmed anecdote.
The “fact checkers” will call the school and the school spokesperson will simply say that they have no comment. Otherwise the school would come under attack or people will lose their jobs. I can pretty much guarantee every “fact checker” will never go beyond calling the school, taking their word for it, and then rating this article “pants on fire false.” That’s the way the system works. Keeping information under wraps is essential.
And of course, nobody outside of the school will be allowed to see the medical records since that is a HPPA violation.
So nobody will know for sure whether I was telling the truth. A lot of the parents of course will know I am. But they aren’t going to speak out. I hope that they do, but I doubt it. Nobody wants to get their head chopped off.
The source who disclosed this information to me isn’t going to go public or obtain unassailable proof of this because that would get someone in trouble. I was requested to ensure all the details were scrubbed so that nobody could be identified other than the school.
Nikki Daniels, MVC’s Interim Head of School, did not respond to an email asking her to confirm the information I received. I can’t say I’m surprised.
That’s totally understandable in today’s supercharged environment of intimidation where relationships can be damaged permanently when people speak out.
But there are going to be people who see exactly the same thing happening in their schools. And they will be afraid to speak out as well. But at least they will know they are not alone. That’s why I wrote this article, in the hopes that it will motivate someone who is not intimidated to speak out.
So this will be a statistic that we all know about and share amongst ourselves, but cannot talk about because we don’t want to get anyone in trouble.
Our kids will die unnecessarily because people are afraid to speak out
It’s really unfortunate that people are afraid to speak the truth. But this is the society we live in today. This is America where we value relationships over lives. It’s really sad.
Not cherry picking data
My stat isn’t cherry picked. This is the first statistic for a rate in myocarditis in a school that anyone has ever revealed to me. And even then, it was under condition of anonymity of all parties involved. But my source is extremely credible.
Most schools won’t ever say anything as to their stats on myocarditis so nobody will ever find out how dangerous the vaccines are.
Anyone who knows will not say anything or they get their head chopped off.
Someone revealed it to someone else thinking it wouldn’t go anywhere. That cycle repeated until it got to me. This is why I have so few data points to go on.
So I’m not cherry picking. I only had one cherry to pick from.
Here’s another stat I have from a physician in Canada. He doesn’t have a lot of young patients. He has older patients. He’s been in practice for 29 years and has 1,200 patients.
Here’s the amazing thing:
In 29 years, he’s never seen a case of pericarditis. This year, he’s seen 4 cases. So that is a rate of 1 in 300 in older people.
Kinda like seeing all those athletes drop on the field this year after the vaccines rolled out.
Here are the details:
All over age 20
3 male (oldest 57)
1 female (she’s 33, the worst case, was hospitalized and required multiple cardiologists)
He didn’t see any cases until June, 2021 (i.e., after the vaccine rolled out)
All of them happened between 1 and 2 weeks of vaccination and they all came in complaining of chest pain
There were no cases reported in people who were not vaccinated
The authorities will reassure you that this is just a fluke and should be ignored. Whew. That’s a relief. What a great, credible explanation, supported by no evidence.
Next, they will try to find out who revealed this and have her medical license revoked. That’s why she can’t reveal her identity.
I’m glad I’m in such good hands and there are no intimidation techniques being used to silence doctors. I’m sure you feel the same way. These Medical Board are so responsible. And the best thing is that they are self-regulating. Got a complaint? They’ll handle it. It’s called “no accountability.”
From my heathcare provider substack:
I am a Canadian nurse (for a few more days I will retain that designation) that lost my job over vaccine mandate. Placed on unpaid for 2 months, opted to retire (in my 60's) to at least have some income. It was probably 6-7 months before I'd planned to go. My union is fighting the mandate and there is perhaps a small hope that the several grievances will provide some payout to me in a year or two. I have no confirmations, but saw a couple of dialysis patients pass away having d dimers higher than I have ever seen in my career (10-20 times higher), and with stroke & cardiac symptoms as well. No one ever questioned ☹️. I was the only person in my unit to decline the shot. I'd had issues (up to requiring brain surgery) after my one & only flu shot, and have severe (anaphylactic) allergies. I received my first pension payment December 1 (after requesting early November!). All unvaxxed staff at my employer were fired December 2. (All had been on unpaid leave since mid-September. Canadian federal gov't changed rules in October so that no one who lost a job because of no jab could receive unemployment insurance. They (our feds) are *very* controlling and very petty.
One other thing…the CDC is also lying to us about the rate of vaccine-induced myocarditis compared to COVID induced myocarditis
Not only did the CDC likely get the rate wrong by a factor of 100, but this video, recorded by UCSF Professor Vinay Prasad, shows that the rates of myocarditis from the vaccines are much higher than those from COVID, particularly for the Moderna vaccine.
Whoops! The CDC screwed up on that too. All the members of the outside committee that reviews vaccines (ACIP), relied on a false representation by the CDC.
Don’t worry, be happy. The CDC says to shut up and take the vaccine.
OK, they got the myocarditis rate in teenage boys wrong by 100x. Nobody cares.
And they got it wrong about vaccine safety. The vaccines are way more deadly than COVID with respect to myocarditis. Nobody will pick up on that either. Too much cognitive dissonance to accept that.
But hey, we live in a world where facts like this simply do not matter. The attitude is “we don’t care how many kids we kill, just shut up and take the vaccine.”
Other independent data confirms that the COVID vaccines are a cardiovascular disaster of epic proportions
There are many other data points indicating the vaccines are super dangerous from a cardiac perspective. Here are three of them.
VAERS statistics for these vaccines are off-the-charts for cardiac events, some elevated nearly 10,000X normal, yet the CDC doesn’t find a signal. If you want objective proof of corruption, you can’t beat this
Cardiac arrest in a 3-year-old just one day after vaccination is the new normal
Heathcare workers are so pissed, they are breaking ranks and speaking out citing ‘Overwhelming’ Numbers of Heart Attacks, Clotting, Strokes.
Monday, 27 December 2021
Merck’s newly FDA-approved COVID-19 antiviral drug, molnupiravir, may pose severe health consequences despite being purchased in bulk by the Biden administration prior to its approval.
Parole di conforto e di coraggio, in questo periodo di festa
"Ponete i bambini sotto il manto protettore della Vergine Santissima, consacrandoli a colei che sottrasse dalla furia di Erode, la minacciata vita del pargoletto Gesù, fuggendo in Egitto
Il signore guarda con amore speciale i fanciulli e non mancherà di dare la sua protezione"
Poi si rivolge ai lavoratori minacciati e portati alla povertà, umiliati per non essersi vaccinati, "Resistete!"
"Resistete perché non cedendo al ricatto, che conquisterete le libertà"
Ai malati in ospedale che vengono segregati, lontani dai loro cari, dice "non lasciatevi abbattere dalla vostra solitudine, dallo sconforto e dalla disperazione
Pregate la Vergine Santissima, di liberarci da questo fardello infernale. Pregate i santi di starvi vicino nel momento dell'abbandono"
Sunday, 26 December 2021
I had 8 independent ways to show this before. And now there are 9. And nobody has a defensible number < 150,000. The CDC still claims no deaths, yet cannot explain how Schirmacher and others goofed.
A new independent study using analysis of excess deaths showed that our estimate of the number of excess deaths was consistent with what they found.
Here are some quotes from the paper:
Results from fitted regression slopes (p<0.05 FDR corrected) suggest a US national average VFR of 0.04% and higher VFR with age (VFR=0.004% in ages 0-17 increasing to 0.06% in ages >75 years), and 146K to 187K vaccine-associated US deaths between February and August, 2021.
Comparing our estimate with the CDC-reported VFR (0.002%) suggests VAERS deaths are underreported by a factor of 20, consistent with known VAERS under-ascertainment bias
Comparing our age-stratified VFRs with published age-stratified coronavirus infection fatality rates (IFR) suggests the risks of COVID vaccines and boosters outweigh the benefits in children, young adults and older adults with low occupational risk or previous coronavirus exposure.
Interestingly, our estimates of 133K to 187K vaccine-related deaths are very similar to recent, independent estimates based off of US VAERS data through August 28th, 2021 by Rose and Crawford (11).
In other words, these researchers found numbers similar to what we found, within a factor of 2. They agree that over 150,000 people have been killed by the vaccines so far. This is more than 3 times the number killed in combat in the Vietnam war; a war which lasted for nearly 20 years.
Meanwhile, critics like my good “friend” Jeffrey Morris admit they haven’t got a clue as to how many people have died and can’t figure out even a single way to estimate it. Stunning. He still thinks there is no proof of causality.
Here’s a 10th method that finds > 200,000 deaths from the vaccine
Courtesy of SidDavis on substack:
(1) Using weekly CDC reports of Deaths from All Causes during the 6 years from January, 2014 to January, 2020, I identified and measured oscillations in that data set to establish the normal weekly pattern and magnitude of deaths we should expect in 2020, 2021 and beyond.
(2) i compared CDC weekly reports of Deaths from All Causes, January 18, 2020 through December 14, 2020. December 14, 2020 was when vaccinations began. The total of deaths in excess of the expected norm was 369,857 or a weekly average of 7,705.366.
(3) I compared CDC weekly reports of Deaths from All Causes, December 14, 2020 through November 13, 2021. The November 13, 2921 report was the most recent with materially correct data. The total of deaths in excess of the expected norm during this period was 487,905 or a weekly average of 10,039.680.
(4) The average increase in excess deaths after vaccines began was 2,334.314 per week or 112,047 deaths in total which can be attributed to the vaccines. Based on these calculations, a reasonable estimate through the end of 2021 is 200,000 deaths.
The estimate of deaths attributed to the vaccines calculated with this logic is if anything low. The medical profession has improved their treatment methods so that should have caused a decrease in deaths as time passed, but the rate instead increased. The most vulnerable should be the first to so as time passed the death rate should have decreased, but the rate instead increased. This means that the vaccine caused deaths would have been slightly higher than my calculated estimate.
Proof of causality
There are so many ways to show the vaccines cause death.
COVID-19 vaccine: Strong association with cardiovascular death, especially hemorrhagic stroke and venous thrombosis shows the mortality odds ratio (MOR) >2 and is highly statistically significant for a variety of adverse events. That can’t happen by chance.
The autopsy work of Dr. Peter Schirmacher in Germany
Jessica Rose’s analysis of the VAERS data showing dose dependency (the graphs are supposed to look the same on Dose 1 and Dose 2 if the vaccines don’t kill people)
The other 8 other analyses listed in this paper
Still no stopping condition; nobody in Congress or at the CDC will set one
However, there is no stopping condition for these vaccines and no member of Congress or the CDC is willing to draw a line in the sand and say, “The US government should halt the vaccines after X number of Americans have been killed.”
A reasonable stopping condition is 32 people. In 1976 we stopped the H1N1 vaccine after just 32 deaths.
Today, the number of deaths allowed is unlimited. And there is no liability for the manufacturers. And there have been no payouts at all to the hundreds of thousands of vaccine injured. Zero. Zip. Nada.
Nobody in Congress (or the mainstream media) seems troubled by the fact that the vaccines kill more people than they save. The Pfizer Phase 3 trial saved 1 life from COVID for every 22,000 people vaccinated. So for 220M fully vaccinated, it’s 10,000 lives saved, but150,000 or more people killed. So we kill 15 people to save 1. And we mandate it to boot.
Maybe someday, we’ll find one member of Congress who will actually pay attention to what the data says and say two words, “I object.”
I need your help to stop the vaccine. Nobody in Congress has the courage to set a stopping condition.
Perhaps one of the 100,000 readers of this article could have a discussion with their representative.
I’ve tried. None of the people in Congress I’ve supported over the years will talk to me anymore. Even their staffs won’t even read what I wrote because it doesn’t agree with what the CDC claims.
Until that day when we find a member of Congress who will listen, I’ll keep writing and hoping that others will succeed where I have failed.