Sunday 20 November 2022

Covid PsyOps Are Now Being Used for Climate Change


As the eco-zealot group Just Stop Oil continue to break the law and cause mayhem, perhaps it is time to investigate who is pulling the strings of this and other fake grassroots movements. Even a cursory glance will make it clear that the people behind it are not everyday members of the public but a group of highly influential American billionaires.

In a four-part series published by The Conservative Woman, Stephen McMurray demonstrates how psychology and money – not facts – are driving the climate alarmist narrative in the UK.  As well as by “independent” groups of psychologists, these psychological tactics are being deployed by the UK government based on a document produced by the Environment and Climate Committee.  The notorious Covid false narrative duo, Chris Whitty and Patrick Valance, are on this committee.

Stephen McMurray is a member of Free Speech Union. What follows is a brief summary of McMurray’s articles, you can read the four articles in full by following the links provided:

  • Part 1 – Money and ideology HERE
  • Part 2 – Margaret Klein Salamon HERE
  • Part 3 – Psychology to nudge the population HERE
  • Part 4 – Coercive Covid tactics reused for the climate crisis narrative HERE

According to the Just Stop Oil website, their main source of funding is the Climate Emergency Fund. Climate Emergency Fund provides “a safe and legal means for donors to support disruptive protest.” The three founding members of this group – Aileen Getty from the Getty oil family, Rory Kennedy, daughter of Senator Robert Kennedy and philanthropist Trevor Neilson – also fund Extinction Rebellion.

Most of the focus has been on the Gettys but it is Neilson who has the most interesting background. After university, he worked as an intern in the White House when Bill Clinton was president. Later he worked for the newly formed Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation as Director of Communications and also acted as the Gates’ personal spokesman. Neilson was also a member of the Clinton Global Initiative, the Council of Foreign Relations and one of the Young Global Leaders for the World Economic Forum.

  • In 2002 Neilson was a co-founder of DATA (Debt, AIDS, Trade, Africa) with Bill Gates, Bono and George Soros.
  • In 2006 Neilson founded the Global Philanthropy Group, which was instrumental in forming Make It Right with Brad Pitt.
  • In 2015 Neilson formed investments (now called Net Zero) with Howard Warren Buffett, grandson of the billionaire Warren Buffett, who was on the board of the Gates Foundation. Net Zero is an investment company specialising in renewable energy.

On the current advisory board members of the Climate Emergency Fund, we see more of the usual themes and ideologies that have nothing to do with the climate but are warmly embraced by the climate crisis zealots.

  • Stephen Kretzmann founded Oil Change, an organisation pressing for the end of oil production. He is a supporter of the Marxist Black Lives Matter movement.
  • Bich Ngoc Cao. She is also on the board of leftwing news site Mother Jones.  She is also on the Board of Library Commissioners for the city of Los Angeles.
  • Bill McKibben compares climate issues to racism and uses the death of George Floyd to make his point.
  • Margaret Klein Salamon is a clinical psychologist and therefore has been involved with vulnerable people suffering high levels of stress and anxiety. In her role in climate activism, she appears to be using her experience to frighten vulnerable people. She is the founder of Climate Awakening which is “a project to unleash the power of climate emotions through scalable small group conversations.” Clearly this site is being used to tell children that they should be terrified by the climate crisis and to make sure they spread that terror to other children. For a clinical psychologist to use children who may be in mental turmoil in this way is despicable. She is then instructing those children to spread the fear to others and further to promote the climate alarmist agenda. It’s totally unethical.  McMurray dedicates the entirety of Part 2 to Salamon’s misuse and abuse of psychology.

If you think Margaret Klein Salamon is an oddity amongst psychologists, think again. Numerous psychologists are now boarding the climate crisis gravy train. There is an organisation called the Climate Psychology Alliance. Like Salamon, they wish to use their expertise in the field of psychology to nudge people into believing in their worldview of climate-induced, impending doom.  This group overtly states that “facts” aren’t really persuading people that the climate crisis is real and that they need use psychology to pressure us all to become true believers:

It is now widely accepted that facts and information about the risk of climate change, taken, alone, do not promote change. There is a growing acceptance that the climate change movement could be enriched by incorporating deeper psychological perspectives. But mainstream positivist psychology is often part of the problem, especially when it reduces the human being to an object to be measured, controlled and then harnessed to the profit-making machine that now threatens our collective future.

The problem with psychology, Climate Psychology Alliance, retrieved 13 November 2022

They even say that climate anxiety is a good thing:

So, deep down, climate anxiety is a good thing because it is needed to awaken people. But strong anxiety is not pleasant, and if there is not enough climate action and psychosocial support, many forms of climate anxiety become problematic and there will also be much climate depression.

Climate Anxiety – What You Need to Know, Climate Psychology Alliance, retrieved 13 November 2022

Therefore, it is beneficial to cause members of the public great distress by telling them the world is about to end, just so long as there are enough psychologists (who traumatised them in the first place) to help them cope by getting them involved in climate action where they too can traumatise others and keep the chain going. What an ingenious way to help destroy people’s lives whilst making lots of money in the process.

It is not just individuals these groups want to target, but corporations as well. An organisation called Climate Psychologists offers consultancy courses to companies.

More than ever companies need to remain agile as they transition towards sustainability … Our HR platform delivers workshops, coaching, psychological support and behavioural change programmes to foster wellbeing in the workplace and goal orientated action.

What we do, Climate Psychologistsretrieved 13 November 2022

Above is the current wording which has been edited since McMurray wrote his article. As noted by McMurray the website previously stated:

Now more than ever companies need to remain agile as they transition towards sustainability. Our climate psychologists deliver workshops, coaching, psychological support and behavioural change programmes to foster containment and responsiveness in uncertain times . . . Discover the power of “Ethical Nudges” to deliver positive effects for your team, and your company – in the office and in the world.

Notice that they aren’t just offering support to employees traumatised by the “climate crisis,” but are using behavioural change programmes and ethical nudging. They are telling employers how to subtly manipulate the minds of their employees to believe in the climate emergency. This is very reminiscent of the government’s SPI-B behavioural insights team that used psychology to terrify people into accepting Covid lockdowns.

Last month the House of Lords Environment and Climate Change Committee published a report entitled ‘In our hands: behaviour change for climate and environmental goals’. 

It is a sinister document in which the government openly state that all aspects of our life need to be managed to lessen the impact of climate change and that mind control techniques, very similar to the ones used to force the public into acquiescing to Covid lockdowns, need to be used against the population.

Chris Whitty – one of the main instigators of the disastrous Covid policy – is on the committee that produced the document and another Covid collaborator, Sir Patrick Vallance, was a witness.

In their opening summary the committee makes it clear every government department will be required to use psychology as a weapon against the public to ensure we behave in line with what the climate alarmists demand.

Further into the document it is made clear that not only are all government departments to be targeted but the private business sector as well, even if it is not in their financial interest to do so.

To emphasise just how much they want to control the minutiae of daily life, one of the key points the committee make is:

Priority behaviour change policies are needed in the areas of travel, heating, diet and consumption to enable the public to adopt and use green technologies and products and reduce carbon-intensive consumption.

House of Lords: Environment and Climate Change Committee, Key Messages, 12 October 2022, pg. 5

Therefore, you will be told what to eat, where you are allowed to go and how you are allowed to get there.  Another key point clearly states that they will tax and legislate you into compliance.

And, as the report points out, it is not just businesses they are trying to use to make you change your behaviour. They also want to use charities and religious institutions to control the minds of the masses.

It is evident that the climate alarmists, with the backing of billionaires, psychologists and the government, are waging a war on the minds of the people to bring about the Great Reset dystopia. They have the power and the money on their side, but clearly, due to having to resort to mind control techniques, they don’t have the truth. As George Orwell is reputed to have said: ‘In the time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.’

It’s time we all became revolutionaries because the truth is that it is not the climate crisis that is the biggest threat to our wellbeing, but the climate crisis alarmists who want to remove the last vestiges of our freedom and plunge us into a never-ending Dark Age.

Saturday 19 November 2022

PfizerGate: Official EU Data proves Thousands are dying every week due to COVID Vaccination with Europe suffering 300k Excess Deaths in 2022


Mortality figures published by 27 countries across Europe reveal that the continent has suffered nearly 300,000 excess deaths so far this year. Officially making 2022 a record-breaking year in terms of death.

Every single age group, including children, has suffered more deaths by week 44 of 2022 than it did by week 44 of 2020, a year that saw extreme waves of alleged Covid-19 deaths.

But if we remove the first wave of Covid-19 deaths in 2020 from the equation, and just look at excess deaths following week 20, we find that the true scale of death in 2022 is even worse.

That’s because Europe recorded 74,684 excess deaths between week 20 and week 44 of 2020, but has recorded 161,403 excess deaths between week 20 and week 44 of 2022. This equates to a 116% increase in excess deaths in 2022 compared to 2020.

The data has been published by the European Mortality Monitoring Project known as EuroMOMO, and does not include deaths in Ukraine, meaning the increase in deaths cannot be attributed to the ongoing war.

According to the published data, deaths among children aged 0-14 actually fell below expected levels in 2020, with Europe recording 172 fewer deaths than expected by week 44.

But it’s been a whole different story in 2020, with Europe recording 929 excess deaths among children aged 0-14 by week 44 of 2022.

Excess deaths among 15-44-year-olds totalled 3,090 by week 44 of 2020. But there have been 1,717 more excess deaths in 2022, with 4,807 excess deaths among the age group by week 44.

Excess deaths have been very similar among 45-64-year-olds however, with 326 more excess deaths actually recorded by week 44 in 2020.

But if we again remove the first wave of alleged Covid-19 deaths, we find that this year actually tells a completely different story. Because there were 6,854 excess deaths between week 20 and week 44 of 2022 among 45-64-year-olds, but 9,836 excess deaths among the age group during the same time frame in 2022. This represents a 44% increase.

There have been nearly 3,000 more excess deaths among 65-74-year-olds in 2022 than there were by week 44 of 2020.

But just look how drastic the difference in excess deaths has been when we again disregard the first wave of alleged Covid-19 deaths –

Between week 20 and week 44 of 2022, Europe recorded 18,798 excess deaths among peopled aged 65-74. Whereas in the same time frame in 2020, Europe recorded 9,623 excess deaths. This equates to a 95% increase in 2022.

It’s a similar story when we look at 75-84-year-olds.

There have been nearly 2,000 more excess deaths among the age group in 2022 than there were by week 44 in 2020.

But when we disregard the first wave of alleged Covid-19 deaths, that gap increases to over 24,000 –

There were 22,151 excess deaths among people aged 75-84 between week 20 and week 44 of 2020. But this number has risen to a shocking 46,181 in 2022. That’s a 109% increase.

Finally, we see the same pattern among those aged 85 and over.

There have been over 6,000 more excess deaths among people aged 85 and above by week 44 in 2022 compared to 2020. But that difference increases to 45,833 when we disregard the first wave of alleged Covid-19 deaths.

There were 33,749 excess deaths among people aged 85 and above across Europe between week 20 and week 44 of 2020. But that number has increased to 79,582 during the same time frame in 2022. That equates to a 136% increase.

What’s most concerning about 2022 is that the year has seen a pretty constant increase in excess deaths week on week across Europe. Whereas the increase in 2020 can be accounted for by the alleged wave of Covid-19 deaths.

This leaves us with the question of why so many people are dying this year.

We can find clues that point to an answer by analysing the deaths among children.

According to the figures provided by 27 countries across Europe, there were 270 fewer deaths than expected among children by week 21 of 2021. But then deaths suddenly began to rise week on week among this age group.

And it just so happens that this directly coincides with the European Medicines Agency extending emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection to children aged 12 to 15.

Following the extension of the emergency use authorisation to children, excess deaths increased to 848 among 0-14-year-olds by the end of 2021.

But if you look a the above chart, you’ll see a slight levelling off at week 48 in terms of excess deaths, before they begin to rise again 1 to 2 weeks later.

It just so happens that this directly coincides with the European Medicines Agency (EMA) extending emergency use authorisation of the Pfizer Covid-19 injection to children aged 5 to 11.

Is this just a coincidence? It seems far too good to be true if it is.

The only main difference between 2022 and 2020 is that millions of people have been injected with an experimental gene therapy numerous times. This, therefore, makes the Covid-19 injections a common denominator.

So it’s quite fair to conclude that the reason 2022 has so far been a record-breaking year for deaths across Europe is that the Covid-19 injections are killing people.

Friday 18 November 2022

Flashback: Charles Lieber’s Liquid Computing


Imagine a computer, suspended in a flask of liquid, which assembles itself when the liquid is poured onto a desktop. Sound like science fiction? Hyman professor of chemistry Dr. Charles Lieber was making it happen in his laboratory in 2001.

In light of scientists around the world finding never seen before self-assembling nanotechnology in Covid injections, an article written in 2001 about Lieber’s liquid computing indicates that the technology isn’t new, it’s only new to us.

Charles Leiber and two Chinese nationals were charged in January 2020 with aiding the People’s Republic of China.

Since 2008 Dr. Lieber who had served as the Principal Investigator of the Lieber Research Group at Harvard University, which specialised in the area of nanoscience, had received more than $15,000,000 in grant funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and Department of Defence (DOD). These grants require the disclosure of significant foreign financial conflicts of interest, including financial support from foreign governments or foreign entities. Unbeknownst to Harvard University, beginning in 2011 Lieber became a “Strategic Scientist” at Wuhan University of Technology (WUT) in China and was a contractual participant in China’s Thousand Talents Plan from in or about 2012 to 2017.

Harvard University Professor and Two Chinese Nationals Charged in Three Separate China Related Cases, US Department of Justice, 28 January 2020

“Fact-checking” blog Snopes immediately debunked the theory that Lieber’s arrest had anything to do with a leaked bioweapon from Wuhan and featured a blog that “painstakingly demonstrates almost nothing in this conspiracist narrative matches the known facts.” The blog was published on 18 February 2020 but updated on 22 December 2021:

Lieber’s arrest had nothing to do with the novel coronavirus … While some may find these arrests to be suspect, the Department of Justice made no mention of coronavirus or biological warfare in their complaints.

Was Charles Lieber Arrested for Selling the COVID-19 Coronavirus to China? Snopes, 18 February 2020

According to American Media Periscope, Harvard knew Lieber was working with WUT. “They had a Joint Nano Key Laboratory and Lieber was the director as well as the ‘strategic scientist’ for WUT. Harvard profited from his pioneering nanotech. As did the DOD, DARPA, NIH, and China.”

In December 2021, Lieber was convicted of six felony charges related to his receipt of millions of dollars in research funding from China.  In early February 2022, Lieber filed a motion for an acquittal or new trial.  At the beginning of September Lieber’s motion was denied. His sentencing date is set for 1 January 2023.

Read more:

The following was originally published in Harvard Magazine, November-December 2001 as ‘Liquid Computing’ by Jonathan Shaw.  No edits have been made including American-British spelling.

Imagine a computersuspended in a flask of liquid, which assembles itself when the liquid is poured onto a desktop. Sound like science fiction? Hyman professor of chemistry Charles Lieber is making it happen in his laboratory, where researchers have already created tiny logic circuits and memory – the two main components of a computer – in just this manner. And these circuits are tiny, just a few atoms across.

Lieber and his team of chemists have done a kind of end-run around the silicon-based microelectronics industry, which for the last 35 years has been making transistors – tiny switches that can be either on or off – exponentially smaller every 18 to 24 months. Intel chairman emeritus Gordon Moore observed this doubling of computing capacity as early as 1965, and his observation became codified as “Moore’s Law.” However, says Lieber, “continued shrinkage ultimately becomes problematic in terms of just how one achieves [it].” Scientists anticipate that we will reach the limits of our ability to create silicon chips using standard fabrication line methods sometime between 2012 and 2017.

That’s because manufacturers today create microelectronic circuits either by depositing silicon on a surface or by etching it away (for example, with acid). But just as metal after it rusts “is sort of rough,” says Lieber, current methods for working with silicon leave rough surfaces that, on the nanometer scale (a nanometer is one billionth of a meter, or one hundred-thousandth the width of a human hair), constitute an ever greater proportion of the tiny wires that make up those circuits. “Ultimately, you can’t keep using those methods,” he says, “because things will be very non-uniform on a small scale. The smaller circuits become, the more imperfections in the manufacturing process begin to play a role in their performance.”

Lieber has “philosophical differences” with the industry’s “top-down” approach to nanotechnology – taking big things and making them smaller. “The way to truly revolutionize the future,” he says, “is to take a completely different approach: build things from the bottom up.” He has done that by starting with the smallest of building blocks – wires only three nanometers across that can be produced relatively cheaply on a bench top with a few thousand dollars’ worth of equipment.

Lieber makes the building blocks using a catalyst that favors growth in only one direction. A key characteristic of the process he developed is that it enables nanowires to be prepared in virtually any “flavor” (i.e., with specific conductive properties). Mixing and matching flavors can then lead to different types of devices. The devices are made in an equally simple manner: an alcohol solution of a specific nanowire flavor is poured through a grooved channel in a polymer block to produce an array of parallel wires. Another set of wires can be laid perpendicular to the first simply by rotating the apparatus 90 degrees. Already, his lab has produced a transistor just 10 atoms across.

The potential application in microelectronics is obvious: the minute size of these building blocks allows for higher transistor densities, which could lead, at least in principle, to more highly integrated and powerful computers. In 10 or 20 years there might be no more need for hard disks, because solid-state memory could store so much data. The nanowire computers of the future will be quite different from those we use today because they will require new kinds of computer architecture and software. Ultimately, the most exciting thing about nanotechnologies is not the sheer power that such a computer could provide, says Lieber, but the fact that “you get fundamentally new properties that you can’t even conceive of when dealing with conventional materials by scaling them down.”

In very small objects, for example, the ratio of the surface area to the interior volume is much larger. “Things that happen at the surface can therefore affect the whole structure,” says Lieber. While an electrical engineer might regard that as a problem, it is a property that can be used to advantage. “Normally a molecule binding to the surface of a transistor wouldn’t have a big effect,” he explains, “but imagine a protein with a charge on it coming up to something very small, where the surface is a big component. You bring this charged body up, and it biologically or chemically switches the transistor. In essence, you can electrically detect when you have a protein, a nucleic acid, or anything else.” What you have created is a sensor.

Hence, Lieber is now working on a “proof of concept” for the National Cancer Institute that will demonstrate the use of nanowire sensors for early detection of prostate cancer. In principle, he says, you could design a centimeter-square chip to detect a billion things simultaneously, even variations in an individual’s DNA. An undergraduate student of his is taking this idea even further, and working to create a biological computing interface.

Another unusual property of Lieber’s nanowires is ballistic conductivity – that is, when you introduce an electron into such a system, it travels through the conductor without losing energy. This property could help reduce the heating that occurs when electrons flow through normal wires – a serious problem in highly integrated electronics. One of Lieber’s graduate students has combined nanowires to create light sources and detectors. This would allow optical circuits – “light is always much faster than electrons,” says Lieber – to be integrated into a nanowire-based computer. “Who knows?” he says. “This may be a way of enabling the concept of quantum computing.”

In classical computers, transistors or bits must be either on or off, set to one or to zero. But in a quantum computer, the bits are simultaneously both one and zero. This is called a superposition. Light exhibits this property in the sense that it is both a wave and a particle: it is a wave, or kind of superposition, until it is detected; at that moment, it becomes a particle, a single photon in a single place. Superposition theoretically allows quantum computers to solve complex algorithms (such as those used in cryptography) that would be impossible for a conventional computer to tackle. The time may be ripe for a new motto: Think small. Really small.