Showing posts with label Numbers. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Numbers. Show all posts

Sunday, 3 April 2011

Good Economic Numbers? Don’t Be Fooled By The Financial Sugar High



The U.S. financial system is like a junkie that needs continually increasing amounts of "junk" to get the same "buzz".  So what is the U.S. financial system addicted to?  It is addicted to money and debt.  For many years, whenever the Federal Reserve would lower interest rates or the U.S government would borrow and spend more money, the U.S. economy would respond positively.  But just like with any other kind of artificial stimulation, over time it has taken greater and greater amounts of debt and cheap money to get a response from our economic system.  So yes, the fact that the official unemployment rate went down 0.1%  last month is good news, but considering the massive amount of spending that the U.S. government is doing and considering the gigantic quantity of money that the Federal Reserve is injecting into the financial system, the truth is that the unemployment rate should be falling much faster than that.  So don't be fooled by the good economic numbers and don't be fooled by the financial "sugar rush".  The U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have been pulling out all the stops to stimulate the economy, and the fact that all of their efforts are barely moving the unemployment rate at all is an indication of just how far our economic situation has degenerated.


Many in the mainstream media were extremely excited when the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that the U.S. unemployment rate declined to 8.8% in March.  U.S. stocks soared as investors enthusiastically welcomed the news.  But should we all really be jumping up and down over this?


The truth is that some other measures show that the unemployment situation in the United States is becoming worse.


According to Gallup, the number of Americans that are either unemployed or working part-time but desiring full-time work actually rose from 19.8 percent in February to 20.3 percent in March.


So let us not get too excited about the employment situation.  Yes, unemployment is not spinning wildly out of control at the moment and that is good news.


However, when you look at the larger picture things look rather grim.


What the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have been doing is that they have been mortgaging our future big time for short-term economic gain.


This year alone, the U.S. government is going to run an all-time record budget deficit of approximately 1.6 trillion dollars.  By borrowing 1.6 trillion dollars that we do not have and spending it into the system, it does stimulate the economy.


There are some members of Congress that would like to implement substantial budget cuts, but most members of Congress fear doing too much budget cutting right now because it would "harm the economy".


And you know what?  They are right - budget cuts would harm our economy in the short-term.


But continuing to pile up all of this debt is setting the stage for an absolute economic nightmare in the mid to long term.


We have lived far, far beyond our means for decades, and most of our politicians are acting like this can go forever.


But tell me, does anyone out there actually believe that we can keep expanding the national debt like this indefinitely?....



Yes, government spending does stimulate the economy.  The Keynesians are right about that.


However, by accumulating a national debt that is spinning wildly out of control, we have completely destroyed the economic future of this nation.


The Federal Reserve has been very busy trying to stimulate the U.S. economy as well.


Over the past couple of years, the Fed has been injecting massive amounts of money into the financial system.  The theory is that the financial system will loan this money out to the American people and that will stimulate the economy and create more jobs.


Well, that may very well be true to a certain extent in the short-term, but as I wrote about yesterday, in the long-term this is going to create a substantial amount of inflation.


The chart posted below cannot be emphasized enough.  It shows how the Fed has dramatically increased the size of the adjusted monetary base since mid-2008....



Yes, all of this new money will stimulate economic activity, but it is completely and totally ludicrous for Ben Bernanke to attempt to deny that this is also going to cause significant inflation.


So when taking a look at the economic numbers, it is absolutely critical to keep in mind that our "authorities" have pushed all the chips to the middle of the table in an all-out attempt to stimulate the economy in the short-term.


The small economic "sugar rush" that we are experiencing right now is all we have gotten out of it so far.


Sadly, this is about the best that the U.S. economy is going to do from now on.  Things really are not going to get much better than this.


Yes, unemployment numbers might come down a little more, but pretty soon inflation is going to really kick in and that is going to have a really negative impact on tens of millions of Americans.


First of all, when inflation really starts taking off it is going to be absolutely devastating for those on fixed incomes.  Many of them will be completely wiped out.


Secondly, those that do have jobs are going to find that their incomes are not nearly keeping up with inflation.


In fact, we are seeing this starting to happen already.


According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. workers in the private sector only saw their pay increase by 2.1% during 2010.


So did what we are paying for food and gas only go up 2.1% in 2010?


Of course not.


So are things getting better so far in 2011?


No.


One of the depressing things about the new numbers released by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics was that wages for U.S. workers did not increase in March.


According to the BLS, the average U.S. worker earned $22.87 an hour during the month of March, which is exactly the same number we saw in February.


So inflation is going up and wages are staying flat.


That means that American family budgets are going to be squeezed even more.


In addition, the numbers from the BLS show that it is still incredibly difficult to get a job.  In fact, the average length of unemployment in the U.S. is now an all-time record 39 weeks.


So is anyone doing well right now?


Well, yes - as I have written about previously, those at the very top of the food chain are doing quite well these days.


According to USA Today, median CEO pay soared 27 percent during 2010.  For the year, median CEO pay was a stunning $9.0 million.


Wouldn't you like to be making 9 million dollars a year?


According a recent report by CNN, the 25 highest-paid hedge fund managers in the United States combined to bring in an astounding $22.07 billion in income during 2010.


Wouldn't you like to get just a small piece of that?


All of the measures that the government and the Federal Reserve are using to stimulate the economy are causing tremendous distortions in our financial system.


Wall Street is absolutely swimming in cash right now.  There are some people that are making obscene amounts of money.


But ultimately the party is going to end for all of us.


It has been incredibly foolish for the government and the Fed to go "all in" in a desperate attempt to boost short-term economic numbers.


Our long-term economic future is completely gone.  Our financial system is heading for a horrible collapse.  It is not a matter of "if" it will happen, but rather "when" it will happen.


You better buckle up and get ready.



View the original article here

Good Economic Numbers? Don’t Be Fooled By The Financial Sugar High



The U.S. financial system is like a junkie that needs continually increasing amounts of "junk" to get the same "buzz".  So what is the U.S. financial system addicted to?  It is addicted to money and debt.  For many years, whenever the Federal Reserve would lower interest rates or the U.S government would borrow and spend more money, the U.S. economy would respond positively.  But just like with any other kind of artificial stimulation, over time it has taken greater and greater amounts of debt and cheap money to get a response from our economic system.  So yes, the fact that the official unemployment rate went down 0.1%  last month is good news, but considering the massive amount of spending that the U.S. government is doing and considering the gigantic quantity of money that the Federal Reserve is injecting into the financial system, the truth is that the unemployment rate should be falling much faster than that.  So don't be fooled by the good economic numbers and don't be fooled by the financial "sugar rush".  The U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have been pulling out all the stops to stimulate the economy, and the fact that all of their efforts are barely moving the unemployment rate at all is an indication of just how far our economic situation has degenerated.


Many in the mainstream media were extremely excited when the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics announced that the U.S. unemployment rate declined to 8.8% in March.  U.S. stocks soared as investors enthusiastically welcomed the news.  But should we all really be jumping up and down over this?


The truth is that some other measures show that the unemployment situation in the United States is becoming worse.


According to Gallup, the number of Americans that are either unemployed or working part-time but desiring full-time work actually rose from 19.8 percent in February to 20.3 percent in March.


So let us not get too excited about the employment situation.  Yes, unemployment is not spinning wildly out of control at the moment and that is good news.


However, when you look at the larger picture things look rather grim.


What the U.S. government and the Federal Reserve have been doing is that they have been mortgaging our future big time for short-term economic gain.


This year alone, the U.S. government is going to run an all-time record budget deficit of approximately 1.6 trillion dollars.  By borrowing 1.6 trillion dollars that we do not have and spending it into the system, it does stimulate the economy.


There are some members of Congress that would like to implement substantial budget cuts, but most members of Congress fear doing too much budget cutting right now because it would "harm the economy".


And you know what?  They are right - budget cuts would harm our economy in the short-term.


But continuing to pile up all of this debt is setting the stage for an absolute economic nightmare in the mid to long term.


We have lived far, far beyond our means for decades, and most of our politicians are acting like this can go forever.


But tell me, does anyone out there actually believe that we can keep expanding the national debt like this indefinitely?....



Yes, government spending does stimulate the economy.  The Keynesians are right about that.


However, by accumulating a national debt that is spinning wildly out of control, we have completely destroyed the economic future of this nation.


The Federal Reserve has been very busy trying to stimulate the U.S. economy as well.


Over the past couple of years, the Fed has been injecting massive amounts of money into the financial system.  The theory is that the financial system will loan this money out to the American people and that will stimulate the economy and create more jobs.


Well, that may very well be true to a certain extent in the short-term, but as I wrote about yesterday, in the long-term this is going to create a substantial amount of inflation.


The chart posted below cannot be emphasized enough.  It shows how the Fed has dramatically increased the size of the adjusted monetary base since mid-2008....



Yes, all of this new money will stimulate economic activity, but it is completely and totally ludicrous for Ben Bernanke to attempt to deny that this is also going to cause significant inflation.


So when taking a look at the economic numbers, it is absolutely critical to keep in mind that our "authorities" have pushed all the chips to the middle of the table in an all-out attempt to stimulate the economy in the short-term.


The small economic "sugar rush" that we are experiencing right now is all we have gotten out of it so far.


Sadly, this is about the best that the U.S. economy is going to do from now on.  Things really are not going to get much better than this.


Yes, unemployment numbers might come down a little more, but pretty soon inflation is going to really kick in and that is going to have a really negative impact on tens of millions of Americans.


First of all, when inflation really starts taking off it is going to be absolutely devastating for those on fixed incomes.  Many of them will be completely wiped out.


Secondly, those that do have jobs are going to find that their incomes are not nearly keeping up with inflation.


In fact, we are seeing this starting to happen already.


According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, U.S. workers in the private sector only saw their pay increase by 2.1% during 2010.


So did what we are paying for food and gas only go up 2.1% in 2010?


Of course not.


So are things getting better so far in 2011?


No.


One of the depressing things about the new numbers released by U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics was that wages for U.S. workers did not increase in March.


According to the BLS, the average U.S. worker earned $22.87 an hour during the month of March, which is exactly the same number we saw in February.


So inflation is going up and wages are staying flat.


That means that American family budgets are going to be squeezed even more.


In addition, the numbers from the BLS show that it is still incredibly difficult to get a job.  In fact, the average length of unemployment in the U.S. is now an all-time record 39 weeks.


So is anyone doing well right now?


Well, yes - as I have written about previously, those at the very top of the food chain are doing quite well these days.


According to USA Today, median CEO pay soared 27 percent during 2010.  For the year, median CEO pay was a stunning $9.0 million.


Wouldn't you like to be making 9 million dollars a year?


According a recent report by CNN, the 25 highest-paid hedge fund managers in the United States combined to bring in an astounding $22.07 billion in income during 2010.


Wouldn't you like to get just a small piece of that?


All of the measures that the government and the Federal Reserve are using to stimulate the economy are causing tremendous distortions in our financial system.


Wall Street is absolutely swimming in cash right now.  There are some people that are making obscene amounts of money.


But ultimately the party is going to end for all of us.


It has been incredibly foolish for the government and the Fed to go "all in" in a desperate attempt to boost short-term economic numbers.


Our long-term economic future is completely gone.  Our financial system is heading for a horrible collapse.  It is not a matter of "if" it will happen, but rather "when" it will happen.


You better buckle up and get ready.



View the original article here

Saturday, 19 March 2011

Geiger Counter Numbers, How Bad is Bad?

radiation-symbol-iconradioactive-symbol-icon

Given the recent events in Japan and the nuclear reactor damage and radiation entering the atmosphere there, the following information may help to understand the units of measurement being discussed, and how it may correlate to Geiger Counter readings such as those being displayed around the country on the Radiation Network.

1 rad = 0.01 gray (Gy)
1 rem = 0.01 sievert (Sv)

1 gray (Gy) = 100 rad
1 sievert (Sv) = 100 rem

Rad and Gray are ‘absorbed dose’ units.
Rem and Sievert are ‘equivalent dose’ units.

They relate to biological damage done to human tissue and factor the differences between types of radiation. A multiplication factor is used that represents the ‘effective’ biological damage of a given type of radiation. This is the main reason for these units – to factor the differences in damage this is caused from one type of radiation to the next.

Radiation Factor (QF Quality Factor)
(1) Beta
(1) Gamma
(1) X-ray
(10) Nuetron
(20) Alpha

For example, the list above shows that a ‘rad’ or ‘gray’ unit of ‘Alpha’ energy that is absorbed by soft human tissue does 20 times more damage than a ‘rad’ or ‘gray’ of Gamma, X-ray or Beta radiation.

CPM (counts per minute) is a measure of radioactivity, a unit of measurement for a Geiger counter. Technically, “It is the number of atoms in a given quantity of radioactive material that are detected to have decayed in one minute.”

Most Geiger counters are calibrated to Cs137 (Cesium).

1,200 CPM on the meter (for Cs137) is about 1 mR/hr (milliRad per hour).
120 CPM on the meter (for Cs137) is about 1 uSv/hr (microSievert per hour).

Answer: It depends on how long you are exposed at any given level. The Radiation Network website, for example, uses a threshold warning level of 100 CPM, mainly because it is unusual to observe levels of 100 or higher without something more going on in the area than just background level.

Having said that, how could one figure out the ‘badness’ of a given level? How bad is bad? All we need to do is put in terms that makes sense.

First, we must understand a few radiation facts and numbers regarding dosage. There tend to be lots of conversions and it can be confusing, but by plodding through the math, you can determine a better idea and relationship of the Geiger counter numbers versus the risks to your health.

Radiation dosage is a measure of the risk of biological harm that the tissues receive in the body.

The unit of absorbed radiation dose is the sievert (Sv). Since one sievert is a large quantity, radiation doses normally encountered are expressed in milliSievert (mSv) or microSievert (µSv) which are one-thousandth or one millionth of a sievert. For example, one chest X-ray will give about 0.2 mSv of radiation dose.

On average, our annual radiation exposure due to all natural sources is about 300 milliRem, which is equivalent to 3 milliSieverts (3 mSv). Adding man-made sources (medical procedures, and others) the average annual U.S. radiation dose is about 600 milliRem, which is equivalent to 6 milliSieverts (6 mSv).

Average annual human exposure to radiation (U.S.)
600 milliRem (mRem)
6 milliSievert (mSv)

Radiation dose for increase cancer risk of 1 in a 1,000
1,250 milliRem (mRem)
12.5 milliSievert (mSv)

Earliest onset of radiation sickness
75,000 milliRem (mRem)
750 milliSievert (mSv)

Onset of radiation poisoning
300,000 milliRem (mRem)
3,000 milliSievert (mSv)

Expected 50% death from radiation
400,000 milliRem (mRem)
4,000 milliSievert (mSv)

With the examples of radiation dose listed above, we can correlate how long it would take to experience those effects based on a hypothetical Geiger counter CPM number.

So, let’s use the number 100, since this is the threshold that the Radiation Network website has chosen. The Cs137 calibration factor listed above (120 CPM) was converted to obtain the proper factored results listed below (0.83x). Higher CPM numbers are also listed for relevancy.

Days compared with the avg. annual human exposure (U.S.)
207 (at 100 CPM)
42 (at 500 CPM)
14 (at 1,500 CPM)
2 (at 10,000 CPM)

Days to receive dose for increase cancer risk of 1 in a 1,000
432 (at 100 CPM)
86 (at 500 CPM)
28 (at 1,500 CPM)
4 (at 10,000 CPM)

Days for earliest onset of radiation sickness
25,937 (at 100 CPM)
5,187 (at 500 CPM)
1,729 (at 1,500 CPM)
259 (at 10,000 CPM)

Conclusion: Regarding the radioactive fallout from Japan reaching here to the U.S., the metered Geiger Counter CPM that we see on the Radiation Network can be compared to the equivalent ‘what-IF’ scenarios listed above. Not saying though that anything less would not be ‘bad’ for us, there are lots of theories out there regarding long-term effects of various types of radioactive ionized particles making it into the food chain, etc…

Interesting fact:
All food sources combined, expose a person to around 40 millirems per year on average.
Many foods are naturally radioactive, and bananas are particularly so, due to the radioactive potassium-40 they contain. The equivalent dose for 365 bananas (one per day for a year) is 3.6 millirems (36 µSv).

Other foods that have above-average levels are potatoes, kidney beans, nuts (especially brazil nuts), and sunflower seeds.

Ways to limit radiation exposure:
1. Time (limit exposure time)
2. Distance (intensity decreases sharply according to the inverse-square-law)
3. Shielding (alpha: nearly anything… a sheet of paper will stop it) (beta: wood, water, plastic-acrylic, aluminum) (gamma: water, concrete, lead)

Disclaimer: Do not rely upon this information for life or health, it is only one person’s estimation based on a several hours research and punching calculator buttons. We have no affiliation with the Radiation Network, who may or may not agree with these numbers.

If you enjoyed this, or topics of preparedness or current events risk awareness, consider our survival blog RSS feed, new posts by E-mail, or bookmark us at Modern Survival Blog

geiger counter san fransiscoradiationnetworkgeiger counter san franciscojapan nuclear rad readingsgeiger measurement wageiger counter networkcpm geiger counterradiation network san franciscoradiation geiger counter comgeiger numbers100 cpm gieger units equals how many remsradiation cpm banana

View the original article here