Showing posts with label Rights. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Rights. Show all posts

Saturday, 2 April 2011

Prepare for a Human Rights Catastrophe in Ivory Coast

It would seem that despite the protestations of probably the most knowledgeable person about Africa in the U.S. Senate, Laurent Gbagbo’s days are numbered.

After a series of victories in key strategic towns across the Ivory Coast, forces loyal to internationally recognized presidential claimant Alassane Ouattara are poised to advance on Abidjan. And all the while, the circle is tightening around Gbagbo. Last night, the Security Council slapped sanctions on Gbagbo, his wife, and a top lieutenants. Today, his top military commanders defected to the South African embassy with his family today.

The question is: will he go quietly or put up a fight? There are about 9,000 UN peacekeepers in Abidjan with a mandate to protect civilians. But their movement has been restricted by armed groups loyal to Gbagbo. There is also a healthy contingent of French troops, who are well armed and well co-ordinated and have a mandate to support UNOCI. These troops could be the decisive in preventing a large scale human rights violations from being visited upon civilians in Abidjan.

That is very much within the realm of possibility. Amnesty International warns of a potential human rights catastrophe in Abidjan.   Human Rights Watch has already documented a case in which forces loyal to Laurent Gbagbo massacred 37 villagers, presumed to be Liberians, in a western town in Ivory Coast:

At least four cars carrying pro-Gbagbo militiamen attacked the village, witnesses said. They were armed with automatic weapons, rocket-propelled grenades and machetes.

The witnesses said the militiamen killed the immigrants inside their homes and as they attempted to flee. They pillaged and burned houses, looting any items of value, including motorcycles, money, televisions, mattresses and clothing.

A 28-year-old Malian man told Human Rights Watch: “At around 3pm we heard the sound of heavy trucks coming and ran into our houses. The men fired into the air, then started breaking down the doors‚ saying: ‘Fire, fire’ and ‘You’re rebels, we’ll kill all of you’.

This could get really ugly.  Really soon.


View the original article here

Prepare for a Human Rights Catastrophe in Ivory Coast

It would seem that despite the protestations of probably the most knowledgeable person about Africa in the U.S. Senate, Laurent Gbagbo’s days are numbered.

After a series of victories in key strategic towns across the Ivory Coast, forces loyal to internationally recognized presidential claimant Alassane Ouattara are poised to advance on Abidjan. And all the while, the circle is tightening around Gbagbo. Last night, the Security Council slapped sanctions on Gbagbo, his wife, and a top lieutenants. Today, his top military commanders defected to the South African embassy with his family today.

The question is: will he go quietly or put up a fight? There are about 9,000 UN peacekeepers in Abidjan with a mandate to protect civilians. But their movement has been restricted by armed groups loyal to Gbagbo. There is also a healthy contingent of French troops, who are well armed and well co-ordinated and have a mandate to support UNOCI. These troops could be the decisive in preventing a large scale human rights violations from being visited upon civilians in Abidjan.

That is very much within the realm of possibility. Amnesty International warns of a potential human rights catastrophe in Abidjan.   Human Rights Watch has already documented a case in which forces loyal to Laurent Gbagbo massacred 37 villagers, presumed to be Liberians, in a western town in Ivory Coast:

At least four cars carrying pro-Gbagbo militiamen attacked the village, witnesses said. They were armed with automatic weapons, rocket-propelled grenades and machetes.

The witnesses said the militiamen killed the immigrants inside their homes and as they attempted to flee. They pillaged and burned houses, looting any items of value, including motorcycles, money, televisions, mattresses and clothing.

A 28-year-old Malian man told Human Rights Watch: “At around 3pm we heard the sound of heavy trucks coming and ran into our houses. The men fired into the air, then started breaking down the doors‚ saying: ‘Fire, fire’ and ‘You’re rebels, we’ll kill all of you’.

This could get really ugly.  Really soon.


View the original article here

Prepare for a Human Rights Catastrophe in Ivory Coast

It would seem that despite the protestations of probably the most knowledgeable person about Africa in the U.S. Senate, Laurent Gbagbo’s days are numbered.

After a series of victories in key strategic towns across the Ivory Coast, forces loyal to internationally recognized presidential claimant Alassane Ouattara are poised to advance on Abidjan. And all the while, the circle is tightening around Gbagbo. Last night, the Security Council slapped sanctions on Gbagbo, his wife, and a top lieutenants. Today, his top military commanders defected to the South African embassy with his family today.

The question is: will he go quietly or put up a fight? There are about 9,000 UN peacekeepers in Abidjan with a mandate to protect civilians. But their movement has been restricted by armed groups loyal to Gbagbo. There is also a healthy contingent of French troops, who are well armed and well co-ordinated and have a mandate to support UNOCI. These troops could be the decisive in preventing a large scale human rights violations from being visited upon civilians in Abidjan.

That is very much within the realm of possibility. Amnesty International warns of a potential human rights catastrophe in Abidjan.   Human Rights Watch has already documented a case in which forces loyal to Laurent Gbagbo massacred 37 villagers, presumed to be Liberians, in a western town in Ivory Coast:

At least four cars carrying pro-Gbagbo militiamen attacked the village, witnesses said. They were armed with automatic weapons, rocket-propelled grenades and machetes.

The witnesses said the militiamen killed the immigrants inside their homes and as they attempted to flee. They pillaged and burned houses, looting any items of value, including motorcycles, money, televisions, mattresses and clothing.

A 28-year-old Malian man told Human Rights Watch: “At around 3pm we heard the sound of heavy trucks coming and ran into our houses. The men fired into the air, then started breaking down the doors‚ saying: ‘Fire, fire’ and ‘You’re rebels, we’ll kill all of you’.

This could get really ugly.  Really soon.


View the original article here

Thursday, 31 March 2011

On the Frontline of Somalia’s Embattled Women’s Rights Movement

Yesterday I received an alarming message from an old friend working for the Women and Family Ministry of the Puntland State of Somalia. Fatthiya Duale, a female Somali leader in Puntland, is calling for help from the diaspora and international community to support women aiming to secure better political representation in an urgent case in Somalia.

The current crisis came after a debate in Badhan, a town in Somalia’s north-central region of Sanag and one of the last progressive communities in the rural areas, apparently divided the community over whether women should ever participate in government.

This is not just one town; it’s the frontline in the Somali women’s rights movement. Here’s a “call to pens” with instructions on how you may be able to help. First, here’s Fatthiya’s letter:

“Only women in power would consider the needs of women without power.”   – Eleanor Roosevelt.

The government of Puntland recently adopted a regional strategy to advance women in local governments. Even though women make up more than 50% of the community, they have not previously held elected or appointed local government positions.  The 2011 Year of the Women in Local Governments was born in Badhan by women in the Sanaag region, Somalia, where 9 women (out of 28 members) were elected to the Regional and City Council.

Moreover, there is a possibility of one more [woman's] seat to be won; one case is yet undecided  in which the women council members caucus (HOOYO) are contesting. The case is still undecided by the commission headed by the Minister of Interior and Pastoral Communities who are looking at the legal rights and the expressed desire of the community, mostly women and youth.

[One influential sub-clan,] one of eight bigger groups who are enjoined by the commission to elect/select one woman of their number of incoming counselors; the male elders of [this] group and their chief decided that a woman among their group is less important than a male member; therefore they insist to bring a male counselor. Unfortunately their women members do not enjoy [the right] like all others to come, voice their wishes and reject the clan order and find their own space in local politics.

This pull and push situation is exacerbated by two clan elders (brothers), who also claim to be knowledgeable in Islam and have their own anti-women interpretation. They immediately started speaking against rights of women participating in decision making.

Today, after Friday payer, on 25th March, 2011, the two brothers, [one of whom] is known for his extreme interpretation of Islam, have once more [set forth] serious allegations in their awaking speeches. In two different [mosques], they went separately giving Friday sermons igniting conflicts, asking and encouraging Muslims, for sure those limited in knowledge in Islam being their target; influencing praying crowds and asking the community to go against the elected women and their supporters.

This is setting fire on democracy and women’s rights, a heavy blow to hard won political success and the courage of women and their supportive communities. Somali women need the world to come to the aid of the courageous women in the local Council of Badhan town.

My fear: [Women less-educated] in Islam might internalize guilt that they may be going against their religion and spiritual beliefs. If the [influential sub-clan] succeeds in grabbing women’s political space for men, then others will follow suit for purely men gaining more power to keep the status-co in place. Women tend to give up their rights if they fear conflicts might turn ugly.

Female participation on local councils is a must because: Women are capable peace builders; the majority of Somali households are women-led, women are excellent communicators; women build strong working relationships; women are creative; and women contribute to increased capacity building. A just and capable society demands full participation and empowerment of all segments of its population. Women are by far the majority paying for education, food, health care, community  water and sanitation, take care of livestock which is the main asset in Somalia. Women take care of the physically  and  mentally challenged and children…

Somali women are undergoing a transition as their society grapples with lack of central institutions, lawlessness and an uncertain future.  Puntland regional government with its new endorsement of election of women to local govt councils and administrations is taking certain steps in the right direction.  The Badhan Council election results are a tribute to Puntland women in particular and all Somali women who are adapting to changing conditions while protecting Islam and the rights with which Islam honors women.

How is it that Somalia is seen in the West as a country dominated with radical male-chauvinists, but here is a story of women making progress? When I first traveled to Somalia, I had those common news report images in mind of a lawless, desolate place run by hordes of Islamic radical male chauvinists. It is true that radicals have torn up a large portion of the country and threaten to change government to be more similar to the Taliban in its prevention of women’s rights and education.

However, in Somalia’s northeast, northwest, and central areas which are not controlled by radical rebel groups, women are not only included in human rights, law, and aid activities but are often the creators and leaders of these activities. Many hold tremendous ideas about preventing violence but since they do not lead armed groups they are rarely if ever invited to discussions about how peace can be achieved. Now one of the great success stories of women’s rights in the rural north is on the verge of being turned back.

As Ms. Duale says, if women can become elected officials in Badhan, then there is hope for the rest of the country to move forward from the dark days of radical male chauvinism. To rally behind women’s local political representation and development in north central Somalia, here’s what you can do:

LETTERS  |  Contact Somalia’s Puntland State government, including the Ministry of Women and Family Affairs, with letters of support for women’s representation in local councils. The state government currently has authority over the eastern part of the Sanag region where Badhan is the main town. Also, notice that the Women and Family Affairs Ministry is listed last.

DONATIONS  |  Support women-led aid and education in the Puntland State by donating to one of the better Somali aid agencies focused in the Sanag region, Horn Relief.

ACTIVISM & MEDIA INQUIRIES  |  If you are at a more advanced level of involvement in Somalia and would like to contact Ms. Duale or the Women’s Ministry or see the letter in full, please contact me at my office at HELO Media, HeloBazaar@gmail.com. We’ll screen inquiries for security and availability before forwarding onward.

LEARN MORE  |  Otherwise, if you want to get to know the context of Somalia beyond the mainstream media politics and body counts, see HELO Magazine – Somalia.

[The Roosevelt quote is in the original. Names of people and clans have been withheld. The letter has also been revised and abbreviated for format.]

Photo: IRIN / Kate Holt / Flickr CC.


View the original article here

Tuesday, 29 March 2011

UN Human Rights Commission adopts resolution against criticism of Islam*

Posted: March 27, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam | Filed under: EnemyWithin-American | 32 Comments »

Arab News – JEDDAH: The UN Human Rights Council unanimously adopted a new resolution on the elimination of forms of discrimination and violence based on religious beliefs.

The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), which represents the Islamic group at the council participated in the March 24 discussion. The United States and the European Union too were represented.

Informed sources in the OIC General Secretariat here said that the new resolution related to combating religious intolerance and negative stereotypes, stigmatization, discrimination, and incitement to violence, and violence against individuals based on religion and belief is not a substitute for an earlier resolution adopted by the UN on combating defamation of religions, which the Human Rights Council had adopted many times in the past several years.

The sources stated that the new resolution is a qualitative breakthrough because it was adopted unanimously, adding, it gives the widest margin of freedom of expression (CRAP!) , with the rejection of discrimination and incitement and stereotypes used by the other or against the symbols of the followers of religions.

However, the sources stressed that the issue of acceptance of the new resolution comes as a goodwill gesture by the organization in order to reach the necessary consensus, bridge the gap, and partner with the West in addressing the anti-Islam sentiments that prevailed in some Western communities toward Muslims.

According to informed sources, the US Secretary of State (HIJAB) Hillary Clinton had invited the OIC to lead, along with both Washington and the European Union, the efforts to draft a new resolution to ensure the foundations adopted by the previous resolution, giving a wider margin of freedom of expression (MORE CRAP).

This is the most contentious of the resolutions, because in countries with strong protections on speech and other forms of expression, the idea that a religion can have the same defamation protections as living individuals is considered an affront to individual rights.






View the original article here

Monday, 7 March 2011

No Voice, No Rights

H/T Junican and Chris Snowdon for this ONS study: ONS is developing new measures of national well-being. The aim is that these new measures will cover the quality of life of people in the UK, environmental and sustainability issues, as well as the economic performance of the country.

To develop better measures of the nation's well-being we want to ask what matters most in people's lives and what is important for measuring the nation's well-being.


I signed up (just name and email address required) and wrote my answer to the following question: What things in life matter most to you?

The simplest of things in life: to be able to sit in a pub and drink a pint of beer and smoke a cigarette and talk to friends. This simple thing brought pleasure and laughter, and allowed networks of friendships and pub communities to grow and flourish within a shared culture.

It's illegal now to do this, of course. And so the happiness it provided, and the friendship, and the community, and the shared culture have all been crushed. With them also, needless to say, freedom and democracy were also crushed.


There was no indication that the above would be published anywhere, or even considered. Still, no harm done by writing something.

It will almost certainly be ignored. Smokers are people whose opinions are systematically ignored. They have no voice in this 'society'.

Chris Snowdon's piece is tagged 'pretend consultation', and he's almost certainly right. The British people will be found to be deliriously happy about everything.

Along similar lines is Michael Kelly's comment on Stewart Cowan's Facebook page:

Stop defending smokers' rights. They have none.michael kelly

I took the trouble not only to check the Facebook page, but also to find out a bit more about Michael Kelly:

Michael Kelly - Celtic director (1990-1994)

Michael Kelly is a Scottish politician and businessman. He held the position of Lord Provost from 1980 to 1984, and was Lord Rector of Glasgow University from 1983 to 1987.


It's one thing to hear such vicious sentiments from some anonymous online commenter. It's quite another to hear them from someone who has held a number of senior posts in public life.

View the original article here