The Mahdi Islam Messiah Coming soon ?

Irvin Baxter of Endtime Ministries talks about the endtime signs for the three monotheistic religion and in particular for Islam regarding the last Imam caled Mahdi or Mehdi or Mahdy , are we really in the end of times as prophesied by different scriptures , is what what we are seeing unfolding in front of our eyes these days all around the Middle east and north Africa a sign of something is it

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for the full story www.Trends2012.co.cc ]]

View the original article here

European Union, The Islam Military Alliance - The Devastating Ancient Prophecy Unfolding Today

The European Union will soon reform into ten member states. This will see Britain withdrawing or being kicked out of the present European Union or common market as it was previously known. This creation will all take shape quickly and at the head of this new union of European members will be Germany. This will however be quite a different Germany to the one we see today. Also we will see an Islam military alliance take shape. Among the nations of this new Islamic military alliance will be Egypt, Libya, Ethiopia. When Egypt and Ethiopia falls into the hands of radical Islamists the vital Red sea shipping route for oil will be controlled by this large Muslim military alliance.

What is happening in Ethiopia and how is Iran inflaming the Islamists?

Vicious fighting is presently boiling over on the borders of Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia. Somalia's feeble transitional government is being ousted by the Islam Iranian -backed Al-shabaab terrorist militia, while Ethiopian forces battle their way to the Somali border to ward off the Islamic extremists.

One of the prominent officials of Al-Shabaab made a public announcement at a gathering convincing Muslims in both Kenya and Ethiopia to revolt against their governments. Sheikh Mahad Omar Abdikarim was quoted as saying that the. "oppressed Muslims of Kenya and Ethiopia need to liberate themselves from Christian domination"

The recent outbreak of anti-Christian hostility has brought about the displacement of 4,000 Christians within the Jimma Zone of Ethiopia. The brutal Muslim attacks started a day before the influential al-shabaab official proclaimed his orders. It all started when a local Muslim accused a Christian of defiling the Koran, hence resulting to the gruesome burning of Fifty-nine churches and twenty eight homes during the attack.

Ethiopian authorities sent out security troops but reports said that they were outnumbered by the Islamist invaders. The 2007 census reveals a statistic of forty four per cent of the population belongs to the Ethiopian Orthodox church, while 34 percent are Sunni Muslim. The rest are scattered to several protestant Christian denominations. As is usual in these type of conflicts there will be a refugee crisis as the christian population of Ethiopia clamours to escape. More than likely these refugees will head towards European Union countries instead of the nearby larger African countries.

The conflicts between the al-shabaab terrorists and the Ethiopian troops in Somalia plus the Muslim attacks on churches across the western Ethiopia have created havoc within and outside the state. The current uproar that has just started out as a Somali civil war might soon trigger an interstate war between the Islam-controlled Somalia and its western opponent.

Somalia's Islamic rebellion, stated in a UN report, is said to be a clear display of their support for the Iranian cause when they sent out 720 of their best-skilled fighters to Lebanon in the summer of 2006 to aid in overthrowing the Israeli forces. As a return for their assistance, the al-shabaab's parent organization, the Islamic Courts Union, received three consignments of arms, ammunition and medical supplies from Iran. To further show their gratitude, Iranian proxy Hezbollah provided Somali rebels with advanced training by sending five military consultants to Somalia.

The support of Al-shabaab terrorist troops to Iran provided the latter with more than extra soldiers in its battle against Israel. The objective of Iran to have power over the flow of oil through the red sea and the Mediterranean sea requires them to also be in control of both the Southern entrance to the red sea and the Mediterranean sea. The authority to implement a trade restriction would be a powerful weapon for Iran and Islam in their battle against the European Union and the rest of the western world. The domination of Iran over Somalia and Eritrea cannot be completed unless the Ethiopian resistance is totally annihilated. Hence, the Islam al-shabaab terrorist militia's battle against Ethiopia is very important.

If you want to understand why the radical Islam is so eager for an alliance or influence over these two countries (including Egypt and Tunisia), look at a good map of the Middle East with a focus on the European Union, Mediterranean Sea and in particular, the Red Sea and all will become clear. Indeed, these two seas cover the most significant trade route in the whole world!

Radical Islam will take control of Ethiopia and will also indisputably also take authority over the small areas of Eritrea and Djibouti on the coastline of the red sea. These areas are also noted to have only just become sovereign from Ethiopia.

Prophecy reveals that a restructured 10 nation European union led by Germany will be ready to confront a Muslim alliance of nations that include Egypt, Ethiopia, Libya and others. This will set off a devastating chain of events that will affect us all.

Find out more about this Devastating Prophecy here european union

UN Human Rights Commission adopts resolution against criticism of Islam*

Posted: March 27, 2011 | Author: barenakedislam | Filed under: EnemyWithin-American | 32 Comments »

Arab News – JEDDAH: The UN Human Rights Council unanimously adopted a new resolution on the elimination of forms of discrimination and violence based on religious beliefs.

The Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC), which represents the Islamic group at the council participated in the March 24 discussion. The United States and the European Union too were represented.

Informed sources in the OIC General Secretariat here said that the new resolution related to combating religious intolerance and negative stereotypes, stigmatization, discrimination, and incitement to violence, and violence against individuals based on religion and belief is not a substitute for an earlier resolution adopted by the UN on combating defamation of religions, which the Human Rights Council had adopted many times in the past several years.

The sources stated that the new resolution is a qualitative breakthrough because it was adopted unanimously, adding, it gives the widest margin of freedom of expression (CRAP!) , with the rejection of discrimination and incitement and stereotypes used by the other or against the symbols of the followers of religions.

However, the sources stressed that the issue of acceptance of the new resolution comes as a goodwill gesture by the organization in order to reach the necessary consensus, bridge the gap, and partner with the West in addressing the anti-Islam sentiments that prevailed in some Western communities toward Muslims.

According to informed sources, the US Secretary of State (HIJAB) Hillary Clinton had invited the OIC to lead, along with both Washington and the European Union, the efforts to draft a new resolution to ensure the foundations adopted by the previous resolution, giving a wider margin of freedom of expression (MORE CRAP).

This is the most contentious of the resolutions, because in countries with strong protections on speech and other forms of expression, the idea that a religion can have the same defamation protections as living individuals is considered an affront to individual rights.

View the original article here

In a stunning declaration, GERMAN Interior Minister says, “Islam does not belong in Germany”

Hans-Peter Friedrich, new interior minister, has said that Islam does not “belong” in the country, and reopened a bitter debate over the integration of Germany’s 4 million Muslims.

REUTERS –Germany’s new interior minister has said Islam is not a key part of the German way of life, tapping into a long-running debate about the role of foreigners in the country. “Islam in Germany is not something substantiated by
history at any point,” Hans-Peter Friedrich told journalists on his first day on the job as Thomas de Maiziere’s replacement on Thursday.

Friedrich turned on its head a remark made last October by President Christian Wulff, who said Islam now “belongs to Germany” because of the 4 million Muslims who lived there. Both men are members of the

conservative parties that make up the larger part of Germany’s coalition government.

One of the ways society could realize its potential was by “bringing its constituent parts together and not forcing them apart or polarizing them,” Friedrich said.

He spoke as German authorities sought to establish what prompted Wednesday’s killing of two US airmen at Frankfurt Airport. They said

 

the 21-year-old Kosovan gunman was probably a lone operator motivated by radical Islamist beliefs. “There is suspicion that the killing may have been motivated by Islamism,” state prosecutors said without elaborating on the nature of the Islamism.

Friedrich’s comments also reflected a push by European governments to better in

tegrate immigrants, given persistent domestic tension between different cultures. British Prime Minister David Cameron said last month that multiculturalism had failed in Britain and left young Muslims vulnerable to radicalization, arguing for a more active policy to heal divisions and promote Western values.

Germany is home to Western Europe’s second-biggest Islamic population after France. The single biggest minority is Turkish.

Friedrich said he set great store by Germany’s Islamic Conference, a forum for dialogue between the government and representatives of Germany’s Muslim community founded in 2006 by one of his predecessors, Finance Minister Wolfgang Schaeuble. Germany’s interior minister hosts the conference.

Pursuing a topic that sparked divisions between Germany and Turkey earlier this week, Friedrich said everyone living or growing up in Germany must “first and foremost learn German.” Speaking in the western city of Düsseldorf on Sunday, Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan told some 10,000 members of Germany’s Turkish community their children should learn Turkish before they learn German. German Foreign Minister Guido Westerwelle had said on Monday that language priorities should be reversed.

A fraught debate was sparked in Germany last summer when then-Bundesbank member Thilo Sarrazin published a bestselling book arguing that Muslim immigrants were welfare spongers who threatened the country’s economy and long-term future.

Friedrich said on Thursday he stood by comments he made last autumn, when he said Germany’s core culture was based around the Judaeo-Christian, Western model and never would be Islamic. A representative of Germany’s central council of Muslims had no immediate comment on Friedrich’s remarks.

March 6, 2011
Categories: Islamization of the West . . Author: barenakedislam

22 Comments

Comments RSS TrackBack Identifier URI

View the original article here

Is the Anglosphere Driving Militant Islam?

Assassination underscores religious intolerance in Pakistan … News of the assassination came to Rev. Majed El Shafie at 3 a.m. Wednesday morning in Toronto. That was when Peter Bhatti, a fellow Christian living in Canada, called to say that his brother, Shahbaz Bhatti, had been killed in Islamabad. Peter Bhatti was “brokenhearted,” Mr. El Shafie recalled in an interview. “He called me to get the rest of his family to Canada from Pakistan. He was like, ‘I beg you, just help me get them out of Pakistan.’” Shaken by the overseas death of his long-time friend, the clergyman added: “How much more blood until people wake up about freedom of religion in Pakistan?” – Globe and Mail

Dominant Social Theme: Why can’t the East be more like the West?

Free-Market Analysis: The assassination of the Christian Minister for Minorities in Pakistan, Shahbaz Bhatti is a tragedy on a number of levels. The mainstream media has explained the tragedy rather well (see excerpt above) emphasizing the horrors or intolerance and Islamic fundamentalism. But in this article we want to examine the idea that the whole story has NOT been told and that institutionalized intolerance is often seeded and cultivated by the Anglosphere as part of a larger divide-and-conquer strategy. In Pakistan and generally throughout the Middle East we would argue that this is so.

There is no doubt the shooting of Bhatti is a shocking and tragic event. It was also a bold one. He was shot by masked gunmen in broad daylight, according to the Globe and Mail Report, after visiting his mother in Islamabad. “The assassination is yet another sign of Muslim-majority Pakistan’s slide into fundamentalism and anarchy,” the Globe and Mail observes, and indeed it is.

Of course, Bhatti was a target in Pakistan, which has grown increasingly intolerant of outside religions other than Islam (presumably Sunni Islam). And Bhatti may have made himself more of a target with what the Globe and Mail calls his (outspoken) contempt for Islamist extremism. “He openly campaigned against sharia law, and had spoken out against a 25-year-old blasphemy law that he felt singled out non-Muslims in Pakistan. Such pronouncements, he frequently acknowledged, made him a marked man. In fact, he prepared several videotaped messages to be broadcast in the event of his death.” Here’s some more from the article:

“The forces of violence, militant banned organizations – the Taliban and al-Qaeda – they want to impose their radical philosophy in Pakistan,” he said in one. “I’m ready to die for a cause. … I would prefer to die for my principles, and for the justice of my community, rather than to compromise on these threats.” Canada’s Immigration Minister, Jason Kenney, was particularly affected by the death of Mr. Bhatti, whom he considered a friend. “I was struck by how resigned he was about his expected martyrdom,” Mr. Kenney said in a statement. “He told me that he would not marry, because he did not want to leave a widow or orphans behind when that time came.” …

Mr. El Shafie, who hails from Egypt’s persecuted Christian minority, had worked on several other projects with the Bhatti brothers over the years. (Peter Bhatti was en route to Pakistan Wednesday to mourn his brother.) “I knew Shahbaz for the last six years. We worked together in many, many ways. He was like a brother,” Mr. El Shafie said. “He believed in what he was doing and he died for what he believed.” … Al-Qaeda and the Pakistani Taliban are apparently claiming responsibility for Mr. Bhatti’s death.

What occurs to us however is that if one tracks the genesis of the current rising extremism, it begins to look less like a homegrown exercise and more like a program of deliberate Anglo-American power elite provocation. This conclusion can be reached if one accepts the generally held perspective that Saudi Arabia – an Anglo-America client state – has been in the business of exporting Wahhabi fundamentalism for a number of decades. It is Saudi Arabia in particular that has helped fund various fundamentalist Sunni movements including the Madrassas in Pakistan and the Al Shabob regime change in Somalia.

It is well known by now that the CIA assisted in shaping the initial presence of Al Quaeda in Afghanistan to oppose the Russians. The Taliban, radicalized Pashtun warriors, were in many cases educated in Saudi-Arabia funded Madrassas. Everywhere one looks there is considerable funding (via Saudi Arabia of course) that supports Islamic fundamentalism and extremism. Supposedly, the Saudis have spent close to US$90 billion prosletyzing for Wahhabism throughout the Islamic world in the past 20 years. it beggars common sense to believe however that if the US were disconcerted by this spending that the Saudis would continue it.

We have spent considerable time recently explaining how we believe the current Western-initiated wave of regime change sweeping the Middle East may replace “strong man rule” with Islamic republics. The idea, always, is to polarize religious ideologies in order to create tension between East and West. Anglosphere money power then exploits this via military actions and by imposing further authoritarian mechanisms on its own citizens.

In the era of the Internet there is perhaps considerably more awareness of this sort of manipulation than in past eras. Daily India for instance yesterday carried a remarkable speculation about the assassination entitled “RAW, MOSSAD or CIA could be behind Pak minister’s assassination.” The report was derived from a Pakistani publication, the Nation. The Daily India news brief summarized the Nation’s perspective, reporting that a “foreign hand” could have furthered the assassination.

The report acknowledges that the assassination has been claimed by the Tehrik-e-Taliban-Pakistan, which has apparently been behind a string of terrorist attacks in the country. But it then points that “Links between foreign intelligence agencies like RAW, MOSSAD and CIA and militants have been suspected. RAW [Indian intel] is even known for having provided financial and military support to spread violence in Pakistan,” it added.

What would be the justification for such attacks? According to Daily India, the Nation speculated that it was “pretty much apparent” that those who carried out the assassination “would have in mind the consequences for our image abroad and the anxiety it would create within the religious minorities.”

The paper also apparently made the claim, according to “well-informed sources”, that the Obama administration “deployed over 400 pro-India and pro-Israel CIA agents in Islamabad, Quetta, Peshawar, Lahore and Karachi, the country’s biggest cities.” It added that these individuals came from private security companies like LLC, Xe services or Blackwater and that leading Indian and Israeli tycoons have been “secretly and heavily funding such companies to carry out clandestine operations in the Middle East, Asia and Africa as per their interests.”

This sort of paranoia – justified or not – is reinforced by current events, specifically the recent capture of a US diplomat, Raymond Davis, who shot and killed three Pakistani men and remains in a Pakistan jail. We reported on this recently in an article entitled “Unraveling of a Pakistan Scam” and quote part of a ZeroHedge.com article entitled “CIA Agent Caught Red-Handed Aiding Pakistani Terrorism?” The cut-line reads, “News that the American accused of killing two Pakistani men is a CIA contractor has intensified an already highly charged situation in Pakistan.” You can see the article here:

http://www.thedailybell.com/1786/Unraveling-of-Pakistan-Scam.html

Fundamentalist zealotry, especially leading to murder, is always tragic. But what is even more tragic in our view is the inextricable involvement of the West in inciting these sorts of activities in furtherance of a divide and conquer strategy leading to further control of the developing world. Instead of helping these countries prosper, the Anglo-American power elite seems content to cultivate extremism as part of a larger program of destabilization and infiltration.

Conclusion: Whether such programs can continue to work in 21st century – when publications such as the Nation and Daily India speculate in real-time on these supposedly top secret machinations – is a question we regularly submit in these modest pages. This is perhaps the dilemma that the Anglo-American elite faces in the Internet era.

View the original article here