European Union, The Islam Military Alliance - The Devastating Ancient Prophecy Unfolding Today

The European Union will soon reform into ten member states. This will see Britain withdrawing or being kicked out of the present European Union or common market as it was previously known. This creation will all take shape quickly and at the head of this new union of European members will be Germany. This will however be quite a different Germany to the one we see today. Also we will see an Islam military alliance take shape. Among the nations of this new Islamic military alliance will be Egypt, Libya, Ethiopia. When Egypt and Ethiopia falls into the hands of radical Islamists the vital Red sea shipping route for oil will be controlled by this large Muslim military alliance.

What is happening in Ethiopia and how is Iran inflaming the Islamists?

Vicious fighting is presently boiling over on the borders of Ethiopia, Kenya and Somalia. Somalia's feeble transitional government is being ousted by the Islam Iranian -backed Al-shabaab terrorist militia, while Ethiopian forces battle their way to the Somali border to ward off the Islamic extremists.

One of the prominent officials of Al-Shabaab made a public announcement at a gathering convincing Muslims in both Kenya and Ethiopia to revolt against their governments. Sheikh Mahad Omar Abdikarim was quoted as saying that the. "oppressed Muslims of Kenya and Ethiopia need to liberate themselves from Christian domination"

The recent outbreak of anti-Christian hostility has brought about the displacement of 4,000 Christians within the Jimma Zone of Ethiopia. The brutal Muslim attacks started a day before the influential al-shabaab official proclaimed his orders. It all started when a local Muslim accused a Christian of defiling the Koran, hence resulting to the gruesome burning of Fifty-nine churches and twenty eight homes during the attack.

Ethiopian authorities sent out security troops but reports said that they were outnumbered by the Islamist invaders. The 2007 census reveals a statistic of forty four per cent of the population belongs to the Ethiopian Orthodox church, while 34 percent are Sunni Muslim. The rest are scattered to several protestant Christian denominations. As is usual in these type of conflicts there will be a refugee crisis as the christian population of Ethiopia clamours to escape. More than likely these refugees will head towards European Union countries instead of the nearby larger African countries.

The conflicts between the al-shabaab terrorists and the Ethiopian troops in Somalia plus the Muslim attacks on churches across the western Ethiopia have created havoc within and outside the state. The current uproar that has just started out as a Somali civil war might soon trigger an interstate war between the Islam-controlled Somalia and its western opponent.

Somalia's Islamic rebellion, stated in a UN report, is said to be a clear display of their support for the Iranian cause when they sent out 720 of their best-skilled fighters to Lebanon in the summer of 2006 to aid in overthrowing the Israeli forces. As a return for their assistance, the al-shabaab's parent organization, the Islamic Courts Union, received three consignments of arms, ammunition and medical supplies from Iran. To further show their gratitude, Iranian proxy Hezbollah provided Somali rebels with advanced training by sending five military consultants to Somalia.

The support of Al-shabaab terrorist troops to Iran provided the latter with more than extra soldiers in its battle against Israel. The objective of Iran to have power over the flow of oil through the red sea and the Mediterranean sea requires them to also be in control of both the Southern entrance to the red sea and the Mediterranean sea. The authority to implement a trade restriction would be a powerful weapon for Iran and Islam in their battle against the European Union and the rest of the western world. The domination of Iran over Somalia and Eritrea cannot be completed unless the Ethiopian resistance is totally annihilated. Hence, the Islam al-shabaab terrorist militia's battle against Ethiopia is very important.

If you want to understand why the radical Islam is so eager for an alliance or influence over these two countries (including Egypt and Tunisia), look at a good map of the Middle East with a focus on the European Union, Mediterranean Sea and in particular, the Red Sea and all will become clear. Indeed, these two seas cover the most significant trade route in the whole world!

Radical Islam will take control of Ethiopia and will also indisputably also take authority over the small areas of Eritrea and Djibouti on the coastline of the red sea. These areas are also noted to have only just become sovereign from Ethiopia.

Prophecy reveals that a restructured 10 nation European union led by Germany will be ready to confront a Muslim alliance of nations that include Egypt, Ethiopia, Libya and others. This will set off a devastating chain of events that will affect us all.

Find out more about this Devastating Prophecy here european union

Libya – the pariah in the EU’s Mediterranean Union plans

So the UK, a nation totally broke and in debt to the rest of the world in excess of £2 trillion, a nation that is running down its military capabilities, closing airbases, scrapping large swathes of its historic Royal Navy, and handing troops their P45's whilst they are fighting in Afghanistan, has decided to embark on yet another war. We have to look behind the rhetoric and sound byte headlines and ask Why?

Following hard on the heels of Cameron doing a quick tour of the Middle East with his band of followers, a high powered gaggle of arms dealers, in the wake of unrest across the region from ‘democracy’ seekers, this military action is a methodology in action..

And it is that which set my mind a thinking. On the one hand the historical view that war always helps to raise a country out of recession, and on the other hand a need to understand where this sudden upsurge of interest for democracy has suddenly appeared from in the Arab states, something that has been puzzling me since I started closely following the events in Egypt.

I have arrived at the conclusion that the start of military action over Libya has nothing to do with the Cameron drafted UN mandate (we all know how the double speak of politics works, and I am old enough and cynical enough never to take the headline at face value), it has nothing to do with protecting the people from a wicked despot (we have heard that excuse before as well), but it does have everything to do with the fact that Libya is not part of any of the organisations listed below, and if the EU is to export its kind of Communitarian ‘civil society’, its faux democracy, then those not in the club have to go, and it will also go a long way to reinforce the beginning of an EU military structure in action.

I believe that this action has long been in the planning, but required the right trigger mechanisms to play out before it could be put into action, i.e. Problem/Reaction/Solution. The removal of Mubarak was a consession, and allowing Saudi Arabia to ‘secure’ Bahrain was another, where a similar state killing spree is going on. The delay in beginning this military action was that until there was a ’20/20 Leader’ in the Libyan rebel camp the US would not endorse it. I believe seeking out that leader was part of the Hague ‘Diplomatic’ mission which went wrong, with the SBS contingent tasked with setting up the target markers.

It occurred to me that I have written about most of this before, but as isolated items. The massive EU funding running into many billions of euros in most of these states for ‘reforms’ in ‘civil society’ and ‘training’. A substantial amount of that training being provided, run, operated or funded by ‘Common Purpose’ or its South African affiliates, which to me accounts for this sudden urge from ‘the people’ of Arab states for democracy.

Then there is the EU’s planned hegemony into Africa. Its renewed activity in The Union for the Mediterranean, under the Barcelona agreement promoted by…. Sarkozy, and its interest in an otherwise unknown geo-region called Sahel.

Back in October 2010 I wrote about The 3041st session of the Council of the European Union – FOREIGN AFFAIRS – will take place on 25 October 2010 (14.45), in the Conference Centre FIL – 5, Rue Carlo Hemmer, Luxembourg, under the presidency of Ms Catherine Ashton, High Representative of the Union for Foreign Affairs and Security Policy.

So lets take a look at what the unelected Ms Ashton will be discussing on behalf of the 500m EU ‘citizens’.

Here is the agenda:

The following items will be discussed at this session:
- Sahel
- Middle East
- Cuba
- Summit preparations
a) EU-US (Lisbon, 20 November 2010)
b) EU-Ukraine (Brussels, 22 November 2010)
c) Union for the Mediterranean (Barcelona, 20-21 November 2010)
- Georgia
- European Neighbourhood Policy

The Sahel is the ecoclimatic and biogeographic zone of transition between the Sahara desert in the North and the Sudanian savannas in the south (the Arabic word, however, means any such transitional zone, e.g. in Algeria). It stretches across the north of the African continent between the Atlantic Ocean and the Red Sea. The Sahel covers parts of the countries of Senegal, Mauritania, Mali, Burkina Faso, Algeria, Niger, Nigeria, Chad, Sudan, Somalia, Ethiopia and Eritrea.

You may recall that this is the area in which the EU opened an immigration centre (Mali) last year to allow a mixed bag of migrants from this region to relocate to the 27 member states of the EU.

However, reading a little deeper, it is also seen by the EU as an area “where a vicious cycle of poverty, political conflict, weak states, drug trafficking, terrorist groups and progressive Islamic radicalisation is increasingly taking hold” according to The European Parliament’s Committees on Security and Defence, Foreign Affairs and Development.

So two questions immediately spring to mind. A) What the hell has this region got to do with the EU, as surely this is covered by their own political regional body, the African Union (the only African state not in the AU is Morocco)

and B) if this area is such a threat to security why is the EU promoting immigration from same.

The second question obviously makes no sense, until you get to the agenda item marked Union for the Mediterranean (Barcelona, 20-21 November 2010). Its about expanding the EU to take in not just those states who have indicated an interest, i.e. Iceland, Turkey, Israel etc, but also those states around the Mediterranean and down into the sub-sahara region whether they want EU interference or not.

So lets look at the Union for the Mediterranean. Firstly here is the official EU take on EuroMed from the EEAS (the EU Foreign Affairs department run my Ms Ashton). Look innocuous enough, not really enough to raise an eyebrow.

Initially opposed by the EU and some members states as they saw it as nothing more than a move by the French to reestablish its colonial days in North Africa, it has this year taken on a new life.

It resurrected The Euro-Mediterranean Regional and Local Assembly, and the Euro-Mediterranean Parliamentary Assembly which consists of parliamentarians appointed by:

* the national parliaments of the EU Member States;
* the national parliaments of the ten Mediterranean partners (Algeria, Egypt, Jordan, Israel, Lebanon, Morocco, Palestine, Syria, Tunisia and Turkey)
* the European Parliament.

The EMPA consists of a maximum of 240 Members, of which 120 are Europeans (75 from the EU national parliaments and 45 from the EP) and 120 are from the NPs of the EU’s Mediterranean partner countries, so as to guarantee North-South parity.

The Assembly’s inaugural meeting took place in Barcelona on 21 January 2010.

The Assembly provides a forum within the Union for the Mediterranean, to bring together members of the EU’s Committee of the Regions and their counterparts from the Mediterranean partner countries, with the aim of strengthening cooperation between local and regional authorities around the Mediterranean.

And lets not forget at this stage people, that every meeting, conference, plenary, dinner, event, report, payment, grant or award is paid for by you the taxpayer, whether that money is channel via Westminster or Brussels.

It appears that the EU is playing a dangerous game of hegemony, encroaching on the political zone currently overseen by the AU, (which you can see by its political bodies is almost identical to the EU), and capitalising on the splits within that organisation, in search of what.

One thing that immediately springs to mind is Oil and Gas, and the EU seems prepared to embark on its own form of the War on Terror, whether real or perceived, using taxpayers money to bribe, cajole or threaten these states in order to acquire the rights to their mineral wealth.

Bring under the EU umbrella those states in the EuroMed zone where political influence is readily exchangeable for cash bribes and projects, and simultaneously extend the security borders of the EU to the Sahel region using the newly formed EU military structures in order to protect those Oil, Gas and mineral deposits.

The European Centre for Development Policy Management (ECDPM) has all the clues in its report, (which I understand will be discussed at the Ashton meeting) but lets be clear, EU funding for this is going to cost taxpayers dear, but the real cost, the human cost to sustain this kind of policy will make the use of military intervention inevitable.

It would appear to some that the EU wants to create its own form of Afghanistan in Africa in an attempt to bind Europe together. That may sound cynical, but expect to see in coming years North African immigrants becoming the patsies for this when the body bags start coming home.

Which brings me back to Morocco. Not being a member of the AU has meant that it has had to look elsewhere for its political and social development, and in many instances its security, and there are many who will say that it has already been bought lock stock and barrel by the EU.

But compliance with the overtures from the EU has its benefits for Morocco. Immigration from Morocco to the EU states is already the highest of any African state, and the EU ‘investment’ in Morocco is currently running at many billions of €’s. There is talk of huge infrastructure projects being funded by the EU, least of which is a road bridge between Morocco and Spain as part of the Euro-Med Transport policy.

I have to ask whether this kind of hedgemonistic policy by the EU is really in the long term interests of the UK, which again raises the question is our membership of the EU in our best interests.

http://pjcjournal.wordpress.com/

View the original article here

Will America collapse like the Soviet Union

America must work on starting a new economy and not restarting the old one or it will resemble the former Soviet Union, Printing free dollars was the dumbest thing the Usa did .The world is now talking about rejecting the Dollar? as reserve currency..I think that usa will colape similar to ussr that they both fought afghans and usa is still fighting and spending billions and billions of dollars

[[ This is a content summary only. Visit my website for the full story www.Trends2012.co.cc ]]

View the original article here

Union Of Concerned Scientists Releases Report On US Nuclear Plant Safety, Finds NRC Oversight Weakness At Indian Point NPP

From a just released report by the Union of Concerned Scientists, focusing on US Nuclear Power Plant oversight by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. “Many of the serious safety or security lapses at U.S. nuclear power plants in 2010 happened because plant owners — and often the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) — failed to address known safety problems.” And something potentially concerning to Buchanan, NY residents where Indian Point NPP is located: “the NRC did not always serve the public well in 2010. This report analyzes serious safety problems at Peach Bottom, Indian Point, and Vermont Yankee that the NRC overlooked or dismissed. At Indian Point, for example, the NRC discovered that the liner of a refueling cavity at Unit 2 has been leaking since at least 1993. By allowing this reactor to continue operating with equipment that cannot perform its only safety function, the NRC is putting people living around Indian Point at elevated and undue risk.” The report’s conclusion: “when the NRC tolerates unresolved safety problems — as it did last year at Peach Bottom, Indian Point, and Vermont Yankee — this lax oversight allows that risk to rise. The more owners sweep safety problems under the rug and the longer safety problems remain uncorrected, the higher the risk climbs.”

Indian Point section from the report:

The Indian Point nuclear plant in New York features two pressurized water reactors (PWRs). To refuel a PWR, workers flood the refueling cavity with water, which allows them to remove irradiated fuel assemblies from the reactor core and replace them with fresh fuel assemblies. The water both removes decay heat from the irradiated fuel assemblies and shields the radiation they emit, protecting the workers.

The Final Safety Analysis Reports (FSARs) submitted by the plant owner with the application for an operating license for Unit 2 stated that the refueling cavity was “designed to withstand the anticipated earthquake loadings,” and that “the liner prevents leakage in the event the reinforced concrete develops cracks.” When the NRC issued the operating license for Unit 2, the leakage prevention function of the liner for the refueling cavity became part of the licensing basis. However, NRC inspectors at Indian Point recently found that the liner has been leaking 2 to 20 gallons per minute since at least 1993 (NRC 2010v), and that the plant owner has not yet delivered on repeated promises to fix the leak. That means the device installed to prevent leakage after an earthquake is leaking before an earthquake even occurs. The liner has no other safety function. Yet NRC managers have dismissed the longstanding problem, noting that the refueling cavity leaks only when it is filled with water (NRC 2010o).

[more...]

View the original article here

Weiss Ratings: Poor Liquidity Contributing Factor for Weiss Ratings’ Initial Evaluation of Wisconsin Heights Credit Union

JUPITER, Florida (March 8, 2011) — On Friday, regulators closed one credit union: Wisconsin Heights Credit Union. This brings the total number of U.S. credit union failures to four for 2011, which is at the same pace as last year.

Wisconsin Heights Credit Union, Omega, Wisconsin, west of Milwaukee, with assets of $785 thousand at September 30, 2010 was rated C- (“Fair”) for the first time based on third quarter 2010 data by Weiss Ratings. It reported a small profit of $10 thousand through September 30, 2010. Wisconsin Heights had Risk-Based Capital ratio of 13.63% and total capital of $107 thousand. Nonperforming loans to core capital made up almost 11% of its loan portfolio. In addition, liquidity for the credit union was well below the industry average of 21% at 1.62%. CoVantage Credit Union based in Antigo, Wisconsin, with assets of $847.7 million and a Weiss Rating of “A-” will assume the deposits of Wisconsin Heights Credit Union.

Weiss Ratings, the nation’s independent provider of bank, credit union and insurance company ratings, accepts no payments for its ratings from rated institutions. It also distributes independent ratings on the shares of thousands of publicly traded companies, mutual funds, closed-end funds and ETFs.

# # #

View the original article here